Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9821 - 9830 of 82011 for judges.
Search results 9821 - 9830 of 82011 for judges.
Frontsheet
: Court: County: Judge: Justices: Concurred: Dissented
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66716 - 2011-06-23
: Court: County: Judge: Justices: Concurred: Dissented
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66716 - 2011-06-23
Opinion-SC
and Justice Ziegler, agree with the recommendation of the three-judge Judicial Conduct Panel (Panel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51705 - 2010-06-30
and Justice Ziegler, agree with the recommendation of the three-judge Judicial Conduct Panel (Panel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51705 - 2010-06-30
[PDF]
WI 50
: Milwaukee JUDGE: Clare L. Fiorenza JUSTICES: CONCURRED: DISSENTED: ABRAHAMSON, C.J
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66884 - 2014-09-15
: Milwaukee JUDGE: Clare L. Fiorenza JUSTICES: CONCURRED: DISSENTED: ABRAHAMSON, C.J
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66884 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
Judge: Clare L. Fiorenza Justices: Concurred: Dissented: ABRAHAMSON, C.J., dissents
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66884 - 2011-06-28
Judge: Clare L. Fiorenza Justices: Concurred: Dissented: ABRAHAMSON, C.J., dissents
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66884 - 2011-06-28
HMO-W Incorporated v. SSM Health Care System
: June 12, 2003 Submitted on Briefs: September 10, 2002 JUDGES: Dykman, Roggensack and Lundsten, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4804 - 2005-03-31
: June 12, 2003 Submitted on Briefs: September 10, 2002 JUDGES: Dykman, Roggensack and Lundsten, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4804 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 62
Roggensack and Justice Ziegler, agree with the recommendation of the three-judge Judicial Conduct Panel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51705 - 2014-09-15
Roggensack and Justice Ziegler, agree with the recommendation of the three-judge Judicial Conduct Panel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51705 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
Argument: September 12, 2007 Source of Appeal: Court: Circuit County: Oneida Judge: Mark
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32946 - 2008-06-03
Argument: September 12, 2007 Source of Appeal: Court: Circuit County: Oneida Judge: Mark
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32946 - 2008-06-03
[PDF]
WI 55
COUNTY: Oneida JUDGE: Mark A. Mangerson JUSTICES: CONCURRED: PROSSER, J., concurs (opinion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32946 - 2014-09-15
COUNTY: Oneida JUDGE: Mark A. Mangerson JUSTICES: CONCURRED: PROSSER, J., concurs (opinion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32946 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
September 9, 2003
justice, two additional justices elected by the supreme court, the chief judge of the court of appeals
/supreme/docs/1207modificationroggensack.pdf - 2012-09-18
justice, two additional justices elected by the supreme court, the chief judge of the court of appeals
/supreme/docs/1207modificationroggensack.pdf - 2012-09-18
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition 19-01 - Minor amendment to petition
judges, may assign any official court reporter, as needed, to any court within the adjoining districts
/supreme/docs/1901minamend.pdf - 2019-02-22
judges, may assign any official court reporter, as needed, to any court within the adjoining districts
/supreme/docs/1901minamend.pdf - 2019-02-22

