Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9831 - 9840 of 18305 for re.

County of Dunn v. Laurence E. Eccles
not but could have reached. In re Estate of Dejmal, 95 Wis.2d 141, 154, 289 N.W.2d 813, 819 (1980). [4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13041 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
In re the termination of parental rights to Londyn F., a person under the age of 18: State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118898 - 2014-08-04

State v. Richard J. Wooster
as a new factor requiring re-sentencing, and (2) whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8229 - 2005-03-31

Kerry J. Kowal v. Gregory W. Kowal
, Stats. No. 98-2491 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV In re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14436 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was a “re-sentencing on new evidence or something like that” but, rather, a simple “ministerial” task
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257475 - 2020-04-14

COURT OF APPEALS
In re the marriage of: Janet M. Anderson, p/k/a Janet M. Roach, Petitioner-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32231 - 2008-03-24

[PDF] State v. Michael B. Ilkka
that his police report had indicated the vehicle was driving “on the center line.” On re-direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13758 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II IN RE THE COMMITMENT OF KEVIN J. HAEN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129031 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] County of Dunn v. Laurence E. Eccles
court, not for evidence to support findings the court did not but could have reached. In re Estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13041 - 2017-09-21

State v. Ronnie P.
, Stats. No. 99-0434 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I In re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15143 - 2005-03-31