Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9831 - 9840 of 41572 for she's.
Search results 9831 - 9840 of 41572 for she's.
[PDF]
State v. Lynette K. Felber
disclosure of the informant, in order to attack the search warrant in a suppression motion. She alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9433 - 2017-09-19
disclosure of the informant, in order to attack the search warrant in a suppression motion. She alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9433 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
testified that she had sex with Andreyev, which she defined as “[h]is penis in my vagina.” She also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34249 - 2008-10-08
testified that she had sex with Andreyev, which she defined as “[h]is penis in my vagina.” She also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34249 - 2008-10-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
responses to the no-merit report. In them, she acknowledges her mental illness and need for treatment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599016 - 2022-12-14
responses to the no-merit report. In them, she acknowledges her mental illness and need for treatment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599016 - 2022-12-14
[PDF]
County of Dunn v. Goldie H.
. We conclude, however, that even if Goldie is correct, she is not aggrieved by the order. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2543 - 2017-09-19
. We conclude, however, that even if Goldie is correct, she is not aggrieved by the order. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2543 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gloria Mack
felony count of false swearing, contrary to § 946.32(1)(a), STATS. She raises several issues. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10946 - 2017-09-19
felony count of false swearing, contrary to § 946.32(1)(a), STATS. She raises several issues. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10946 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Cheri S. v. Crystal C.
Crystal’s motion, and she appeals.1 Statutory interpretation is a question of law which this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13331 - 2017-09-21
Crystal’s motion, and she appeals.1 Statutory interpretation is a question of law which this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13331 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Peggy Sue Lockett
Savidusky Furquarters as a repeater, contrary to §§ 943.50(1m), 939.05 and 939.62, STATS. She was also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7951 - 2017-09-19
Savidusky Furquarters as a repeater, contrary to §§ 943.50(1m), 939.05 and 939.62, STATS. She was also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7951 - 2017-09-19
Patricia Marie Wathen v. Robert W. Moore
court that she has not stated what these expenses are and how her burden has increased with sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5594 - 2005-03-31
court that she has not stated what these expenses are and how her burden has increased with sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5594 - 2005-03-31
State v. Aaron J. Lindh
). ¶3 Lindh first argues that Jens should not have been permitted to testify unless she had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2487 - 2005-03-31
). ¶3 Lindh first argues that Jens should not have been permitted to testify unless she had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2487 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stacey R. Piper
an affirmative defense: “[T]he defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25277 - 2006-05-24
an affirmative defense: “[T]he defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25277 - 2006-05-24