Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9851 - 9860 of 66434 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 9851 - 9860 of 66434 for motion to dismiss.
[PDF]
State v. Eric T. Scott
, 2001 retail theft was dismissed and read in at sentencing. Scott received a total of 200 days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17891 - 2017-09-21
, 2001 retail theft was dismissed and read in at sentencing. Scott received a total of 200 days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17891 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Lisa J. Brown v. MR Group, LLC
. MAWDSLEY, Judge. Dismissed in part. Before Anderson, P.J., Nettesheim and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6815 - 2017-09-20
. MAWDSLEY, Judge. Dismissed in part. Before Anderson, P.J., Nettesheim and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6815 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying her postdisposition motion. She contends that her no contest plea at the fact finding hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209373 - 2018-03-20
denying her postdisposition motion. She contends that her no contest plea at the fact finding hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209373 - 2018-03-20
[PDF]
State v. Victoria L. Quaerna
claims was error. She argues that the court should have granted her motion to dismiss the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14495 - 2017-09-21
claims was error. She argues that the court should have granted her motion to dismiss the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14495 - 2017-09-21
Lisa J. Brown v. MR Group, LLC
: robert g. mawdsley, Judge. Dismissed in part. Before Anderson, P.J., Nettesheim and Snyder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6815 - 2005-03-31
: robert g. mawdsley, Judge. Dismissed in part. Before Anderson, P.J., Nettesheim and Snyder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6815 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John A. Mahoney
appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss for pretrial delay and the denial of his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3009 - 2017-09-19
appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss for pretrial delay and the denial of his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3009 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
approximately a month before trial. The trial court2 then granted the State’s motion to dismiss the “using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446897 - 2021-11-02
approximately a month before trial. The trial court2 then granted the State’s motion to dismiss the “using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446897 - 2021-11-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and voluntarily dismissed that appeal in February 2016. In the meantime, Lori had filed a motion to change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179778 - 2017-09-21
and voluntarily dismissed that appeal in February 2016. In the meantime, Lori had filed a motion to change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179778 - 2017-09-21
State v. Edward D. Anderson
, he filed a motion seeking dismissal of the charges because of the pre-arrest delay. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19746 - 2005-09-26
, he filed a motion seeking dismissal of the charges because of the pre-arrest delay. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19746 - 2005-09-26
[PDF]
State v. Edward D. Anderson
was held, he filed a motion seeking dismissal of the charges because of the pre-arrest delay. ¶3 After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19746 - 2017-09-21
was held, he filed a motion seeking dismissal of the charges because of the pre-arrest delay. ¶3 After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19746 - 2017-09-21