Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9851 - 9860 of 20982 for word.
Search results 9851 - 9860 of 20982 for word.
Deborah Martin-Semrow v. Marc Raymond Semrow
, to satisfy that obligation through means specifically set forth in the judgment itself. In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13612 - 2005-03-31
, to satisfy that obligation through means specifically set forth in the judgment itself. In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13612 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
because counsel provided ineffective assistance by not moving for a mistrial. In other words, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206541 - 2018-01-03
because counsel provided ineffective assistance by not moving for a mistrial. In other words, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206541 - 2018-01-03
[PDF]
David Kneer v. James M. Sarkauskas
implied or inferred from the words used, from customs and from the relation of the parties." Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9302 - 2017-09-19
implied or inferred from the words used, from customs and from the relation of the parties." Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9302 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
[a prior] judgment of divorce is granted,” his marriage to Sassalee is null and void. In other words
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215756 - 2018-07-16
[a prior] judgment of divorce is granted,” his marriage to Sassalee is null and void. In other words
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215756 - 2018-07-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
of § 974.06(4) applies unless the defendant shows, in the words of the statute, a “sufficient reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32933 - 2014-09-15
of § 974.06(4) applies unless the defendant shows, in the words of the statute, a “sufficient reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32933 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court credited Decorah’s testimony that, in the circuit court’s words, Decorah “was not even given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74947 - 2014-09-15
court credited Decorah’s testimony that, in the circuit court’s words, Decorah “was not even given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74947 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI APP 97
in the ordinance. In other words, Bettendorf believed the permit’s lack of assignability limits meant he could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32759 - 2008-06-24
in the ordinance. In other words, Bettendorf believed the permit’s lack of assignability limits meant he could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32759 - 2008-06-24
2007 WI APP 168
of a new bifurcated sentence with modified terms. As we shall see, neither case law nor the clear wording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29463 - 2007-07-24
of a new bifurcated sentence with modified terms. As we shall see, neither case law nor the clear wording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29463 - 2007-07-24
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
. at 687. In other words, in order to prove prejudice, Huck must show that “there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
. at 687. In other words, in order to prove prejudice, Huck must show that “there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
___, ___ N.W.2d ___, we concluded that the word “shall” in § 343.44(2)(b
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193797 - 2017-09-21
___, ___ N.W.2d ___, we concluded that the word “shall” in § 343.44(2)(b
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193797 - 2017-09-21