Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9871 - 9880 of 70089 for hi.
Search results 9871 - 9880 of 70089 for hi.
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment convicting him of causing mental harm to a child and from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56614 - 2010-11-16
a judgment convicting him of causing mental harm to a child and from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56614 - 2010-11-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pro se from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97846 - 2014-09-15
pro se from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97846 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, entered on his guilty plea, convicting him on one count of repeated acts of physical abuse of the same
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=361194 - 2021-05-04
, entered on his guilty plea, convicting him on one count of repeated acts of physical abuse of the same
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=361194 - 2021-05-04
[PDF]
State v. Emmanuel O. Okoronta
abuse injunction and for bail jumping. He argues that he is entitled to a new trial because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3101 - 2017-09-20
abuse injunction and for bail jumping. He argues that he is entitled to a new trial because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3101 - 2017-09-20
State v. Emmanuel O. Okoronta
is entitled to a new trial because his attorney erroneously used a peremptory strike to remove a biased juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3101 - 2005-03-31
is entitled to a new trial because his attorney erroneously used a peremptory strike to remove a biased juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3101 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the order denying his postconviction motion without a hearing. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246201 - 2019-09-10
the order denying his postconviction motion without a hearing. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246201 - 2019-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. Arturo Hernandez, pro se, appeals from a circuit court order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80704 - 2012-04-09
CURIAM. Arturo Hernandez, pro se, appeals from a circuit court order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80704 - 2012-04-09
State v. Russell Martin
Martin appeals from an order denying his motions for postconviction relief. The issue on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15182 - 2005-03-31
Martin appeals from an order denying his motions for postconviction relief. The issue on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15182 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Frank J. Geniesse
contends that a warrantless entry into his garage violated the Fourth Amendment and, therefore, all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9759 - 2017-09-19
contends that a warrantless entry into his garage violated the Fourth Amendment and, therefore, all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9759 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Brash, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Charles E. Bishop, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160640 - 2017-09-21
and Brash, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Charles E. Bishop, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160640 - 2017-09-21