Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9871 - 9880 of 20981 for word.
Search results 9871 - 9880 of 20981 for word.
State v. Joseph C. Mente
breath. I noticed that as he was talking to me, his eyes were – I hate to use the word glazed on over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18856 - 2005-07-05
breath. I noticed that as he was talking to me, his eyes were – I hate to use the word glazed on over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18856 - 2005-07-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that a valid plea does not require the circuit court to use “magic words or an inflexible script”). Upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261873 - 2020-05-27
that a valid plea does not require the circuit court to use “magic words or an inflexible script”). Upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261873 - 2020-05-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.”). In other words, this court cannot provide McCune an 2018AP527 5 opportunity to revisit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233248 - 2019-01-24
.”). In other words, this court cannot provide McCune an 2018AP527 5 opportunity to revisit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233248 - 2019-01-24
State v. Patricia G.
on the underlying controversy. In other words, a moot question is one which circumstances have rendered purely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6515 - 2005-03-31
on the underlying controversy. In other words, a moot question is one which circumstances have rendered purely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6515 - 2005-03-31
County of Dane v. William S.
does not convert that choice into a statutory mandate or a plainly worded statute into an ambiguous one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11243 - 2005-03-31
does not convert that choice into a statutory mandate or a plainly worded statute into an ambiguous one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11243 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert P. Murphy v. MCC, Inc.
relies on the wording of the trial court’s order in Murphy I to try to narrow what “all assets” means
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4913 - 2017-09-19
relies on the wording of the trial court’s order in Murphy I to try to narrow what “all assets” means
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4913 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Bethann Burazin Zaffiro v. Richard Lawrence Zaffiro
words, the trial court properly found that Richard’s actual income would be enough to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6990 - 2017-09-20
words, the trial court properly found that Richard’s actual income would be enough to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6990 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
are satisfied that the circuit court recognized the central inquiry under Virgil D. In other words, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31686 - 2008-01-30
are satisfied that the circuit court recognized the central inquiry under Virgil D. In other words, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31686 - 2008-01-30
State v. Anthony A. Parker
reliance upon these words is excessively literal and finds no support in the case law. In Evers, we held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2673 - 2005-03-31
reliance upon these words is excessively literal and finds no support in the case law. In Evers, we held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2673 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.… [Trial counsel] explains that the words 15 years may have come up, likely did come up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85491 - 2014-09-15
.… [Trial counsel] explains that the words 15 years may have come up, likely did come up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85491 - 2014-09-15