Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9881 - 9890 of 13595 for competency.

COURT OF APPEALS
is competent from its own experience to determine and apply … [an ordinary care] standard.” Cramer, 45 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59772 - 2011-02-07

Oneida County v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
“’within the special competence of the courts rather than the Commission ….’” City of Brookfield v. WERC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2280 - 2005-03-31

Mardie Hartenstein v. Pekin Insurance Company
of loss, either may demand an appraisal of the loss. In this event, each party will choose a competent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25506 - 2006-06-12

David J. Carmain v. Affiliated Capital Corporation
letter when no legally sufficient answer was made by a legally competent person and that excusable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4604 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Angelo J. Ewing
of professionally competent assistance.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690. To prove prejudice, a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4196 - 2017-09-19

State v. Steven Buckingham
of professionally competent assistance.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690. A defendant will fail if counsel’s conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12409 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jeffry P. Van Groll
funds. ¶18 It should be noted that, although Attorney Van Groll failed to demonstrate competence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20001 - 2005-10-18

Michael S. Elkins v. Shawn B. Schneider
issue. It had no competency to decide this issue. This is precisely why we have a doctrine called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4821 - 2005-03-31

Dunn County v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
and competing prerogatives must ultimately be struck by the sheriff, not a collective bargaining agreement. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25024 - 2006-06-27

COURT OF APPEALS
’ testimony is competent evidence from which the jury could, and did, conclude that Feaman did, indeed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31313 - 2007-12-26