Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9891 - 9900 of 66014 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 9891 - 9900 of 66014 for motion to dismiss.
Cathy Strozinsky v. School District of Brown Deer
the District's motion to dismiss the case. ¶4 The court of appeals reversed. The court did not expressly
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17365 - 2005-03-31
the District's motion to dismiss the case. ¶4 The court of appeals reversed. The court did not expressly
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17365 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 193
to Counts 3-6 with the penalty enhancer, and the State moved to dismiss Counts 1 and 2 but read them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29733 - 2014-09-15
to Counts 3-6 with the penalty enhancer, and the State moved to dismiss Counts 1 and 2 but read them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29733 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases: added the recently accepted case 2008AP3235
to constitute “sufficient reason” authorizing that defendant to raise the claim in a subsequent motion under
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52823 - 2014-09-15
to constitute “sufficient reason” authorizing that defendant to raise the claim in a subsequent motion under
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52823 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Renee K. VanCleve v. City of Marinette
in future non-economic loss damages. ¶13 The City filed a motion to dismiss VanCleve's claim, arguing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16468 - 2017-09-21
in future non-economic loss damages. ¶13 The City filed a motion to dismiss VanCleve's claim, arguing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16468 - 2017-09-21
Renee K. VanCleve v. City of Marinette
loss damages. ¶13 The City filed a motion to dismiss VanCleve's claim, arguing that no judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16468 - 2005-03-31
loss damages. ¶13 The City filed a motion to dismiss VanCleve's claim, arguing that no judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16468 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
se, appeals from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06(4) (2023-24)1 postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=960409 - 2025-05-28
se, appeals from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06(4) (2023-24)1 postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=960409 - 2025-05-28
David J. Winkel v. Jeanette M. Wilke
. and Ronald E. Wilke appeal pro se from an order denying their motion to reopen a default judgment entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14219 - 2005-03-31
. and Ronald E. Wilke appeal pro se from an order denying their motion to reopen a default judgment entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14219 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, David filed a motion seeking to modify custody and placement of Peter. Relative to that proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30557 - 2014-09-15
, David filed a motion seeking to modify custody and placement of Peter. Relative to that proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30557 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in denying her motion to suppress because the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to seize her.[2] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82806 - 2012-05-22
in denying her motion to suppress because the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to seize her.[2] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82806 - 2012-05-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with 2 Macho’s motion in the circuit court was a motion to dismiss, which also asked that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82806 - 2014-09-15
with 2 Macho’s motion in the circuit court was a motion to dismiss, which also asked that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82806 - 2014-09-15