Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 991 - 1000 of 82362 for case status.
Search results 991 - 1000 of 82362 for case status.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and his mandatory release date was improperly extended while he was still in segregation status. Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102068 - 2017-09-21
, and his mandatory release date was improperly extended while he was still in segregation status. Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102068 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the case at any later date. Rodebaugh’s counsel did not indicate any limitation except
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80353 - 2014-09-15
the case at any later date. Rodebaugh’s counsel did not indicate any limitation except
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80353 - 2014-09-15
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Keith E. Halverson
2000 WI 113 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 00-0843-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16368 - 2005-03-31
2000 WI 113 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 00-0843-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16368 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
office would be able to try the case at any later date. Rodebaugh’s counsel did not indicate any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80353 - 2012-04-04
office would be able to try the case at any later date. Rodebaugh’s counsel did not indicate any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80353 - 2012-04-04
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶5 Nelson insists a new factor exists in this case, and “the otherwise applicable timeliness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93708 - 2013-03-04
. ¶5 Nelson insists a new factor exists in this case, and “the otherwise applicable timeliness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93708 - 2013-03-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case, and “the otherwise applicable timeliness requirements do not apply.”3 At the core of Nelson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93708 - 2014-09-15
in this case, and “the otherwise applicable timeliness requirements do not apply.”3 At the core of Nelson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93708 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Dorothy A. Lowe v. City of Appleton
and remand the case for a new trial on grounds that the jury's verdict is inconsistent and perverse. Lowe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9303 - 2017-09-19
and remand the case for a new trial on grounds that the jury's verdict is inconsistent and perverse. Lowe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9303 - 2017-09-19
Charles R. Koehn v.
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 95-2578-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17058 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 95-2578-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17058 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Keith E. Halverson
2000 WI 113 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 00-0843-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16368 - 2017-09-21
2000 WI 113 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 00-0843-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16368 - 2017-09-21
Daniel P. Gaugert v. Howard E. Duve
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-3004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14660 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-3004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14660 - 2005-03-31