Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 991 - 1000 of 30164 for de.
Search results 991 - 1000 of 30164 for de.
City of Madison v. Susan J. Sharratt
: by trying the case anew to either a judge or jury. If an appellant chooses the de novo option, any errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10080 - 2006-03-31
: by trying the case anew to either a judge or jury. If an appellant chooses the de novo option, any errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10080 - 2006-03-31
Douglas A. v. Winnebago County
a de novo review using the same methodology employed by the circuit court.[2] See Ottinger v. Pinel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14564 - 2005-03-31
a de novo review using the same methodology employed by the circuit court.[2] See Ottinger v. Pinel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14564 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: John Des Jardins, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63393 - 2012-09-24
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: John Des Jardins, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63393 - 2012-09-24
[PDF]
The Third Branch, summer 2000
by Karen Leone de Nie, administrative assistant to the Supreme Court counties for using qualified
/news/thirdbranch/docs/summer01.pdf - 2009-12-02
by Karen Leone de Nie, administrative assistant to the Supreme Court counties for using qualified
/news/thirdbranch/docs/summer01.pdf - 2009-12-02
[PDF]
Frontsheet
.2d 693. "We review de novo the circuit court's dismissal of a complaint for failure to state
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=539679 - 2022-09-02
.2d 693. "We review de novo the circuit court's dismissal of a complaint for failure to state
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=539679 - 2022-09-02
[PDF]
Phillip Adam v. Brown County
and the employee's work station was de minimus; (3) denied Mary Steckart's claim; and (4) denied double damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11297 - 2017-09-19
and the employee's work station was de minimus; (3) denied Mary Steckart's claim; and (4) denied double damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11297 - 2017-09-19
Village of Lannon v. Wood-Land Contractors, Inc.
invite subterfuge or sham in claims involving de minimis use. Accordingly, we recognize the corollary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16586 - 2005-03-31
invite subterfuge or sham in claims involving de minimis use. Accordingly, we recognize the corollary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16586 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Town of Baraboo v. Village of West Baraboo
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology and standards as the trial court. See Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17924 - 2017-09-21
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology and standards as the trial court. See Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17924 - 2017-09-21
Phillip Adam v. Brown County
that uncompensated six minutes per day spent walking between the punch clock and the employee's work station was de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11297 - 2005-03-31
that uncompensated six minutes per day spent walking between the punch clock and the employee's work station was de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11297 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the proper standard and scope of review on appeal is de novo, rather than the common law certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532084 - 2022-06-14
, the proper standard and scope of review on appeal is de novo, rather than the common law certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532084 - 2022-06-14