Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 991 - 1000 of 2436 for nys.
Search results 991 - 1000 of 2436 for nys.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, under subpart (h), “[a]ny exculpatory evidence”); Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963) (“[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=864977 - 2024-10-24
, under subpart (h), “[a]ny exculpatory evidence”); Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963) (“[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=864977 - 2024-10-24
Megal Development Corporation v. Craig Shadof
' position. Wisconsin Stat. § 806.19(4)(a) provides in relevant part that "[a]ny person who has secured
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20196 - 2005-11-07
' position. Wisconsin Stat. § 806.19(4)(a) provides in relevant part that "[a]ny person who has secured
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20196 - 2005-11-07
State v. James M. Moran
"[a]ny physical evidence that the district attorney intends to offer in evidence at the trial," § 971.23
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18971 - 2005-07-11
"[a]ny physical evidence that the district attorney intends to offer in evidence at the trial," § 971.23
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18971 - 2005-07-11
[PDF]
Proposed Joint Discovery Plan
LLP 919 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: (212) 891-1600 eedmondson@jenner.com ohoffman
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/proposedjointdisc.pdf - 2021-12-03
LLP 919 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: (212) 891-1600 eedmondson@jenner.com ohoffman
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/proposedjointdisc.pdf - 2021-12-03
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition 21-04 - Comments from Christina J. Gilbert, Senior Youth Policy Counsel, The Gault Center, National Juvenile Defender Center
- 6 223A (2012); NY: N.Y. COMP. CODES R. & REGS. Tit. 9, § 168.3(a) (2013); NC: N.C
/supreme/docs/2104commentsgilbert.pdf - 2021-12-23
- 6 223A (2012); NY: N.Y. COMP. CODES R. & REGS. Tit. 9, § 168.3(a) (2013); NC: N.C
/supreme/docs/2104commentsgilbert.pdf - 2021-12-23
2007 WI APP 7
are not convinced. Wisconsin Stat. § 66.0628(2) provides that: “[a]ny fee that is imposed by a political
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27483 - 2007-01-30
are not convinced. Wisconsin Stat. § 66.0628(2) provides that: “[a]ny fee that is imposed by a political
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27483 - 2007-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the purge conditions” of the order, adding “[a]ny and all financial obligations previously imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=934519 - 2025-04-02
of the purge conditions” of the order, adding “[a]ny and all financial obligations previously imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=934519 - 2025-04-02
COURT OF APPEALS
,” the court could consider factors set out in the statute, as well as “[a]ny other factor that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140978 - 2015-04-29
,” the court could consider factors set out in the statute, as well as “[a]ny other factor that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140978 - 2015-04-29
Phyllis M. Landis v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
and fee. [A]ny person … having a claim or a derivative claim under this chapter for bodily injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2231 - 2005-03-31
and fee. [A]ny person … having a claim or a derivative claim under this chapter for bodily injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2231 - 2005-03-31
Brenda Murphy v. Bruce C. Nordhagen
,” and that “it is probable that he missed the diagnosis” of the disc injury. [8] The statute provides that “[a]ny physician
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13673 - 2005-03-31
,” and that “it is probable that he missed the diagnosis” of the disc injury. [8] The statute provides that “[a]ny physician
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13673 - 2005-03-31