Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 991 - 1000 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 991 - 1000 of 12912 for prosecuting.
[PDF]
State v. Steven W. Gauerke
identifies several specific gaps in the prosecution’s case that he believes destroyed his plea’s factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11455 - 2017-09-19
identifies several specific gaps in the prosecution’s case that he believes destroyed his plea’s factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11455 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and [is] unconstitutionally seized from it without probable cause, that is a provocation for which prosecution is barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72351 - 2014-09-15
and [is] unconstitutionally seized from it without probable cause, that is a provocation for which prosecution is barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72351 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Tomas Rodrequez Consuegra
in the report. ¶13 Consuegra also asserts that the plea agreement was breached by the prosecution’s failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14515 - 2017-09-21
in the report. ¶13 Consuegra also asserts that the plea agreement was breached by the prosecution’s failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14515 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jamie S.
of the juvenile delinquency petition for prosecutive merit. The court accepted the offer and found prosecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11739 - 2005-03-31
of the juvenile delinquency petition for prosecutive merit. The court accepted the offer and found prosecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11739 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tomas Rodrequez Consuegra
in the report. ¶13 Consuegra also asserts that the plea agreement was breached by the prosecution’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14515 - 2005-03-31
in the report. ¶13 Consuegra also asserts that the plea agreement was breached by the prosecution’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14515 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Timothy B. Wilks
separate incidents with four different elderly women. At trial, over defense objection, the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10770 - 2017-09-20
separate incidents with four different elderly women. At trial, over defense objection, the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10770 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
probable cause, that is a provocation for which prosecution is barred.” ¶4 Putting aside our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72351 - 2011-10-18
probable cause, that is a provocation for which prosecution is barred.” ¶4 Putting aside our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72351 - 2011-10-18
COURT OF APPEALS
and burned her at the stake. The prosecution bit on the gossip, but never disclosed it to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84068 - 2012-06-26
and burned her at the stake. The prosecution bit on the gossip, but never disclosed it to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84068 - 2012-06-26
State v. Mark H. Price
, Price argues that the repeat offender portion of the sentence is void because the prosecution did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10367 - 2005-03-31
, Price argues that the repeat offender portion of the sentence is void because the prosecution did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10367 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven W. Gauerke
identifies several specific gaps in the prosecution’s case that he believes destroyed his plea’s factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12023 - 2005-03-31
identifies several specific gaps in the prosecution’s case that he believes destroyed his plea’s factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12023 - 2005-03-31