Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9901 - 9910 of 12873 for se.
Search results 9901 - 9910 of 12873 for se.
[PDF]
NOTICE
, that the eventual search of his jacket was unreasonable. Although warrantless searches are per se unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30846 - 2014-09-15
, that the eventual search of his jacket was unreasonable. Although warrantless searches are per se unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30846 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to pay. Brian, pro se, denied the allegations, and the court scheduled a trial. ¶4 The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118874 - 2014-08-04
to pay. Brian, pro se, denied the allegations, and the court scheduled a trial. ¶4 The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118874 - 2014-08-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). ¶1 PER CURIAM. Keith Myers, pro se, appeals a circuit court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234551 - 2019-02-12
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). ¶1 PER CURIAM. Keith Myers, pro se, appeals a circuit court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234551 - 2019-02-12
[PDF]
State v. Eric L. Small
filing pro se pleadings. At the hearing on the motion to withdraw, Small’s attorney further informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14166 - 2014-09-15
filing pro se pleadings. At the hearing on the motion to withdraw, Small’s attorney further informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14166 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Bernegger, pro se, appeals a circuit court order dismissing his amended petition for a writ of mandamus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928561 - 2025-03-18
Bernegger, pro se, appeals a circuit court order dismissing his amended petition for a writ of mandamus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928561 - 2025-03-18
State v. Kenneth Pringle, Jr.
. At that hearing, Pringle, who appeared pro se, and the State jointly recommended “five years probation consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26448 - 2006-09-11
. At that hearing, Pringle, who appeared pro se, and the State jointly recommended “five years probation consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26448 - 2006-09-11
COURT OF APPEALS
appeared pro se. On appeal, both are represented by counsel, who concede the impropriety of their clients
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54225 - 2010-09-08
appeared pro se. On appeal, both are represented by counsel, who concede the impropriety of their clients
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54225 - 2010-09-08
[PDF]
Roger W. Alswager v. Roundy's Inc.
: On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Roger W. Alswager, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6801 - 2017-09-20
: On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Roger W. Alswager, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6801 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on account of his pro se status. The court denied the motion, indicating Cortese should have known about
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231771 - 2019-01-09
on account of his pro se status. The court denied the motion, indicating Cortese should have known about
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231771 - 2019-01-09
[PDF]
WI App 21
maximum is subject to a harmless error test. It is not a per se violation of the defendant’s due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76924 - 2014-09-15
maximum is subject to a harmless error test. It is not a per se violation of the defendant’s due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76924 - 2014-09-15