Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9911 - 9920 of 13664 for competency.

State v. Carl C. Martin
, the identified acts or omissions were outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance." Guck, 170
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7949 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
diagnosing and treating a patient presenting with William’s symptoms. Because there was “competing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65230 - 2011-06-01

State v. David J. Lenz
is ordered to provide for support of a child by a court of competent jurisdiction in this state ….” Child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15332 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
competent representation. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690. Because “[j]udicial scrutiny of counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33008 - 2008-06-16

Patricia S. Magyar v. Wisconsin Health Care Liability Insurance Plan
period, however, the statute also balances the competing interest that a policyholder must take some
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17455 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
is competent from its own experience to determine and apply … [an ordinary care] standard.” Cramer, 45 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59772 - 2011-02-07

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 10, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
, performance is deficient if it falls outside the range of professionally competent representation. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114116 - 2014-06-09

ITW Deltar v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
to submit to or follow any competent and reasonable medical or surgical treatment .… [7] ITW bases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14612 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
except idiots and lunatics were competent to act as executors; and that neither infancy, nonresidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140833 - 2015-04-27

State v. Patrick J. Fahey
, they essentially offer competing interpretations of the statute. Fahey takes the position that courts must always
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18812 - 2005-07-26