Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9911 - 9920 of 63536 for records.
Search results 9911 - 9920 of 63536 for records.
CA Blank Order
been received. Based upon an independent review of the no-merit report and circuit court records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98508 - 2013-06-25
been received. Based upon an independent review of the no-merit report and circuit court records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98508 - 2013-06-25
[PDF]
Rev. Thomas Ponchik v. John J. Eversman
was egregious and without a clear and justifiable excuse. Because the trial court record before us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11553 - 2017-09-19
was egregious and without a clear and justifiable excuse. Because the trial court record before us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11553 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
scores on the COMPAS actuarial assessment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115626 - 2014-06-24
scores on the COMPAS actuarial assessment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115626 - 2014-06-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105120 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105120 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
relating to Ellis’s juvenile record. Thus, his motion was, in actuality, a motion seeking postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28147 - 2007-02-20
relating to Ellis’s juvenile record. Thus, his motion was, in actuality, a motion seeking postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28147 - 2007-02-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
the petition because it concluded that the record was insufficient to support Burns’ claims. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32799 - 2014-09-15
the petition because it concluded that the record was insufficient to support Burns’ claims. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32799 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
issues appellate counsel had addressed, and independently reviewing the record, we affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29858 - 2014-09-15
issues appellate counsel had addressed, and independently reviewing the record, we affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29858 - 2014-09-15
State v. Anthony D. Taylor
records for the trial in one of the prosecutions. Taylor added that he had a defense in both cases based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14172 - 2005-03-31
records for the trial in one of the prosecutions. Taylor added that he had a defense in both cases based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14172 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135482 - 2015-02-24
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135482 - 2015-02-24
Rev. Thomas Ponchik v. John J. Eversman
record before us is inadequate for due process purposes, we reverse and remand with directions. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11553 - 2005-03-31
record before us is inadequate for due process purposes, we reverse and remand with directions. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11553 - 2005-03-31