Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9911 - 9920 of 63537 for records.
Search results 9911 - 9920 of 63537 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Lyle W. Jourdan
. Nos. 96-0663-CR, 96-0664-CR 96-0665-CR, 96- 0666-CR -3- The facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10491 - 2017-09-20
. Nos. 96-0663-CR, 96-0664-CR 96-0665-CR, 96- 0666-CR -3- The facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10491 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
Supervision that Metcalfe signed on June 29, 2004, are not part of the record. The Rules he signed on July 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31768 - 2008-02-11
Supervision that Metcalfe signed on June 29, 2004, are not part of the record. The Rules he signed on July 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31768 - 2008-02-11
[PDF]
State v. Anthony M. Harris
the plea. State v. Thomas, 2000 WI 13, ¶¶18-24, 232 Wis. 2d 714, 605 N.W.2d 836. ¶6 The record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7099 - 2017-09-20
the plea. State v. Thomas, 2000 WI 13, ¶¶18-24, 232 Wis. 2d 714, 605 N.W.2d 836. ¶6 The record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7099 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
and was not made part of the appellate record. See State v. Aderhold, 91 Wis. 2d 306, 314, 284 N.W.2d 108 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63280 - 2011-05-02
and was not made part of the appellate record. See State v. Aderhold, 91 Wis. 2d 306, 314, 284 N.W.2d 108 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63280 - 2011-05-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206161 - 2017-12-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206161 - 2017-12-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, which may be overcome only by objective information in the record justifying the increased sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142822 - 2015-06-09
, which may be overcome only by objective information in the record justifying the increased sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142822 - 2015-06-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
court denied the motion finding that the record belied his assertions, and that he had not established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27785 - 2014-09-15
court denied the motion finding that the record belied his assertions, and that he had not established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27785 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no- merit reports, Sprague’s response, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255475 - 2020-03-04
of the no- merit reports, Sprague’s response, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255475 - 2020-03-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we summarily affirm the orders because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271848 - 2020-07-22
of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we summarily affirm the orders because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271848 - 2020-07-22
[PDF]
State v. Mark Anthony Solorio
supervision. His claim is based on the contentions that the trial court: (1) failed to state on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18775 - 2017-09-21
supervision. His claim is based on the contentions that the trial court: (1) failed to state on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18775 - 2017-09-21