Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9911 - 9920 of 63956 for records.
Search results 9911 - 9920 of 63956 for records.
[PDF]
NOTICE
court denied the motion finding that the record belied his assertions, and that he had not established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27785 - 2014-09-15
court denied the motion finding that the record belied his assertions, and that he had not established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27785 - 2014-09-15
State v. Anthony M. Harris
The record does not support Harris’ claim that the trial court conducted an inadequate plea colloquy. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7099 - 2005-03-31
The record does not support Harris’ claim that the trial court conducted an inadequate plea colloquy. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7099 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2022AP331-CRNM 2 review of the Record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694043 - 2023-08-23
. No. 2022AP331-CRNM 2 review of the Record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694043 - 2023-08-23
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
response and conducted an independent review of the record. We concluded that there were no meritorious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27037 - 2006-11-06
response and conducted an independent review of the record. We concluded that there were no meritorious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27037 - 2006-11-06
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1035340 - 2025-11-12
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1035340 - 2025-11-12
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Barnes could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141369 - 2015-05-04
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Barnes could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141369 - 2015-05-04
CA Blank Order
of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94671 - 2013-03-25
of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94671 - 2013-03-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We conclude that there is no issue of arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238652 - 2019-04-03
the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We conclude that there is no issue of arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238652 - 2019-04-03
[PDF]
Nancy A. Webb v. Andrew J. Webb
based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record. Sellers, 201 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3076 - 2017-09-19
based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record. Sellers, 201 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3076 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
and subsequent motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133307 - 2015-01-20
and subsequent motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133307 - 2015-01-20