Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9911 - 9920 of 63537 for records.
Search results 9911 - 9920 of 63537 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206161 - 2017-12-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206161 - 2017-12-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, which may be overcome only by objective information in the record justifying the increased sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142822 - 2015-06-09
, which may be overcome only by objective information in the record justifying the increased sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142822 - 2015-06-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
court denied the motion finding that the record belied his assertions, and that he had not established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27785 - 2014-09-15
court denied the motion finding that the record belied his assertions, and that he had not established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27785 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no- merit reports, Sprague’s response, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255475 - 2020-03-04
of the no- merit reports, Sprague’s response, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255475 - 2020-03-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we summarily affirm the orders because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271848 - 2020-07-22
of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we summarily affirm the orders because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271848 - 2020-07-22
[PDF]
State v. Mark Anthony Solorio
supervision. His claim is based on the contentions that the trial court: (1) failed to state on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18775 - 2017-09-21
supervision. His claim is based on the contentions that the trial court: (1) failed to state on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18775 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
considering the no-merit report and independently reviewing the record, we summarily affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177645 - 2017-09-21
considering the no-merit report and independently reviewing the record, we summarily affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177645 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to file a response, and has responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512867 - 2022-04-27
right to file a response, and has responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512867 - 2022-04-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
names for clarity. 3 It appears from the record the purpose of the Westconsin Credit Union debts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106856 - 2017-09-21
names for clarity. 3 It appears from the record the purpose of the Westconsin Credit Union debts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106856 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
been received. Based upon an independent review of the no-merit report and circuit court records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98508 - 2013-06-25
been received. Based upon an independent review of the no-merit report and circuit court records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98508 - 2013-06-25