Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9921 - 9930 of 68502 for did.

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
. Zabala did not subsequently file any response or any additional motions to extend the time for him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95094 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Joseph Keepers
the validity of the initial stop, alleging that the officers did not have a reasonable suspicion that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2284 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Robert C. McRoberts, Jr. v. Toni L. Kant
on the plan documents produced in discovery, he did not think Mason Shoe was entitled to recover. McRoberts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24853 - 2017-09-21

State v. James E. Asbury
, Asbury argues that he should have a new trial because the circuit court did not conduct a colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21696 - 2006-03-14

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 24, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
. Gumieny testified he did not remember telling police that other individuals drove him home. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26882 - 2006-10-23

State v. April O.
that good cause existed to extend the time limits, it did not make that finding until after the limits had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16019 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of Ordinances.” ¶3 Borntreger did not respond to the County’s complaint. An individual named Donna Douglas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92246 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
and the assistant district attorney about withdrawing, counsel did not file a motion to withdraw because the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41635 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Sara M.
theories: (1) that the County did not comply with the statutory requirements for timely filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13584 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
the underlying note was paid in full, Schanon did not execute a satisfaction of the December 1, 2003 mortgage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80481 - 2012-04-09