Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9921 - 9930 of 65155 for or b.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was filed in the office of the clerk of circuit court the same day. See WIS. STAT. § 806.06(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82369 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶6 We agree with the State that Garrison’s command, “[b]itch, open the register,” was designed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170946 - 2017-09-21

[MS WORD] CR-235: Written Explanation of Determinate Life Sentence
), and 973.014(1g)(b), Wisconsin Statutes This form shall not be modified. It may be supplemented
/formdisplay/CR-235.doc?formNumber=CR-235&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2020-12-01

Newton Manufacturing Company Corp. v. Department of Industry
108.02(12)(a) and (b), Stats. Five factors determine whether the individual was engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8553 - 2005-03-31

[MS WORD] CV-423: Earnings Garnishment - Exemption Notice
Garnishment – Exemption Notice §§812.34(2)(b)&(c), 812.37 and 812.44(4), Wisconsin Statutes This form shall
/formdisplay/CV-423.doc?formNumber=CV-423&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2021-11-24

[PDF] City of Marshfield v. Frank A. Vietschegger
by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(b), STATS. "We" and "our" refer to the court. No. 95-2720
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9762 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
establish that there is an adequate factual basis for the plea. See Wis. Stat. § 971.08(1)(b) (2009-10)[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83600 - 2012-06-18

[PDF] WI 24
. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that, effective July 1, 2022: SECTION 1. 804.03 (4) (title), (a), (b), and (c
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=513728 - 2022-04-21

[PDF] J.P. Mach, Inc. v. Wayne Stewart
J. P. MACH, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAYNE STEWART, d/b/a CIRCLE S. FARMS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8714 - 2017-09-19

State v. Charles D. Yoder
, opined that Halbert should be overruled, while three justices, Justices Roland B. Day, Donald W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8251 - 2005-03-31