Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9941 - 9950 of 63187 for records.
Search results 9941 - 9950 of 63187 for records.
State v. Anthony M. Harris
The record does not support Harris’ claim that the trial court conducted an inadequate plea colloquy. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7097 - 2005-03-31
The record does not support Harris’ claim that the trial court conducted an inadequate plea colloquy. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7097 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=951579 - 2025-05-06
of the record as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=951579 - 2025-05-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159896 - 2017-09-21
. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159896 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
guaranty. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2013AP202 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102956 - 2017-09-21
guaranty. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2013AP202 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102956 - 2017-09-21
State v. Darnial C. Craig
on the record. We conclude that the objection was preserved. ¶4 During the State’s opening statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2860 - 2005-03-31
on the record. We conclude that the objection was preserved. ¶4 During the State’s opening statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2860 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131323 - 2014-12-03
was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131323 - 2014-12-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206161 - 2017-12-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206161 - 2017-12-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
relating to Ellis’s juvenile record. Thus, his motion was, in actuality, a motion seeking postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28147 - 2007-02-20
relating to Ellis’s juvenile record. Thus, his motion was, in actuality, a motion seeking postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28147 - 2007-02-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
been produced and included in the record. In deciding the reconsideration motion, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33275 - 2014-09-15
been produced and included in the record. In deciding the reconsideration motion, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33275 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308670 - 2020-12-02
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308670 - 2020-12-02