Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9951 - 9960 of 57247 for id.
Search results 9951 - 9960 of 57247 for id.
[PDF]
State v. Jamal R. Jackson
Ogden forbids a “sentence which fits the crime, but not the criminal.” Id. at 571, 544 N.W.2d at 576
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12772 - 2017-09-21
Ogden forbids a “sentence which fits the crime, but not the criminal.” Id. at 571, 544 N.W.2d at 576
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12772 - 2017-09-21
State v. Lance L. Egner
conditions imposed in several bonds were different in fact. Id. at 109. We explained that “[e]ach count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7159 - 2005-03-31
conditions imposed in several bonds were different in fact. Id. at 109. We explained that “[e]ach count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7159 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dwayne E. Hudson
sufficient to justify a consecutive sentence. Id., ¶17. ¶5 Here, the court noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18444 - 2005-06-06
sufficient to justify a consecutive sentence. Id., ¶17. ¶5 Here, the court noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18444 - 2005-06-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
://wcca.wicourts.gov/faq, §§ 1c., 3a. (last visited June 26, 2019). The policy is now in effect. See id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243004 - 2019-06-27
://wcca.wicourts.gov/faq, §§ 1c., 3a. (last visited June 26, 2019). The policy is now in effect. See id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243004 - 2019-06-27
[PDF]
State v. Bobby Recco Jones
an inadequate showing on one. Id. at 697. To demonstrate prejudice, the defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11592 - 2017-09-19
an inadequate showing on one. Id. at 697. To demonstrate prejudice, the defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11592 - 2017-09-19
Lynnette M. Branshaw v. Larry L. Stormer
the jury’s verdict if there is any credible evidence to support it.” Id. (citation omitted). “Our task
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20741 - 2005-12-21
the jury’s verdict if there is any credible evidence to support it.” Id. (citation omitted). “Our task
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20741 - 2005-12-21
State v. Jamal R. Jackson
a “sentence which fits the crime, but not the criminal.” Id. at 571, 544 N.W.2d at 576. Thus, the Ogden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12772 - 2005-03-31
a “sentence which fits the crime, but not the criminal.” Id. at 571, 544 N.W.2d at 576. Thus, the Ogden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12772 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not automatically entitle the defendant to sentence modification.” Id., ¶37. Rather, if a new factor is present
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894290 - 2024-12-26
not automatically entitle the defendant to sentence modification.” Id., ¶37. Rather, if a new factor is present
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894290 - 2024-12-26
CA Blank Order
; and (2) the defendant must show that the new factor justifies sentence modification. Id., ¶¶36-37
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119843 - 2014-08-18
; and (2) the defendant must show that the new factor justifies sentence modification. Id., ¶¶36-37
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119843 - 2014-08-18
CA Blank Order
. Id. Next, we apply those facts to constitutional standards de novo. Id. Reasonable suspicion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103765 - 2013-11-05
. Id. Next, we apply those facts to constitutional standards de novo. Id. Reasonable suspicion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103765 - 2013-11-05