Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9951 - 9960 of 49813 for our.
Search results 9951 - 9960 of 49813 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sufficient to warrant a modification of Silva’s payments. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=884944 - 2024-12-03
sufficient to warrant a modification of Silva’s payments. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=884944 - 2024-12-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of trial counsel’s motion to withdraw at sentencing. Our review of the appellate record satisfies us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001485 - 2025-08-27
of trial counsel’s motion to withdraw at sentencing. Our review of the appellate record satisfies us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001485 - 2025-08-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858564 - 2024-10-10
RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858564 - 2024-10-10
Reginald D. Burke v. Gary McCaughtry
ruling without deference to the trial court’s decision, and our review is limited to the committee’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14274 - 2005-03-31
ruling without deference to the trial court’s decision, and our review is limited to the committee’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14274 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 260, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review of the records and of counsel’s analysis in the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987074 - 2025-07-22
, 260, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review of the records and of counsel’s analysis in the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987074 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that denied her motion for relief from a judgment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976202 - 2025-07-01
that denied her motion for relief from a judgment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976202 - 2025-07-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has not responded. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976925 - 2025-07-01
has not responded. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976925 - 2025-07-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court’s exercise of its sentencing discretion. Our review of a sentence determination begins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759310 - 2024-02-08
court’s exercise of its sentencing discretion. Our review of a sentence determination begins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759310 - 2024-02-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
true and correct. Robles indicated satisfaction with his attorney’s representation. Nothing in our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812308 - 2024-06-12
true and correct. Robles indicated satisfaction with his attorney’s representation. Nothing in our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812308 - 2024-06-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252785 - 2020-01-22
for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252785 - 2020-01-22