Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9951 - 9960 of 50070 for our.
Search results 9951 - 9960 of 50070 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
attorney did not move to suppress his incriminating statements. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045533 - 2025-12-03
attorney did not move to suppress his incriminating statements. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045533 - 2025-12-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
se, appeals the order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1025806 - 2025-10-21
se, appeals the order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1025806 - 2025-10-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
se, appeals the order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1025806 - 2025-10-21
se, appeals the order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1025806 - 2025-10-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ sentence. We agree with counsel that this issue lacks arguable merit. Our review of a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=945983 - 2025-04-24
’ sentence. We agree with counsel that this issue lacks arguable merit. Our review of a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=945983 - 2025-04-24
COURT OF APPEALS
to cover our normal yearly cost of living. ¶3 At that time, Karl raised no objection to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88193 - 2012-10-15
to cover our normal yearly cost of living. ¶3 At that time, Karl raised no objection to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88193 - 2012-10-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has not responded. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976925 - 2025-07-01
has not responded. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976925 - 2025-07-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, S.C. (collectively, “the defendants”). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834679 - 2024-08-08
, S.C. (collectively, “the defendants”). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834679 - 2024-08-08
CA Blank Order
, or it appears he or she cannot, act in an impartial manner.” Because our review is limited to whether the judge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144916 - 2015-07-20
, or it appears he or she cannot, act in an impartial manner.” Because our review is limited to whether the judge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144916 - 2015-07-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. With regard to Matos-Rodriguez’s guilty pleas, our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=966766 - 2025-06-10
erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. With regard to Matos-Rodriguez’s guilty pleas, our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=966766 - 2025-06-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
contrary to WIS. STAT. § 940.19(2) 1 On our own motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253620 - 2020-02-12
contrary to WIS. STAT. § 940.19(2) 1 On our own motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253620 - 2020-02-12