Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9951 - 9960 of 50086 for our.
Search results 9951 - 9960 of 50086 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. With regard to Matos-Rodriguez’s guilty pleas, our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=966766 - 2025-06-10
erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. With regard to Matos-Rodriguez’s guilty pleas, our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=966766 - 2025-06-10
[PDF]
Nancy Hanson and Larry Hanson v. Village of Balsam Lake
the legislature’s intent, and our first resort is to the statutory language itself. Id. If the words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2250 - 2017-09-19
the legislature’s intent, and our first resort is to the statutory language itself. Id. If the words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2250 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Despite our full consideration of Stecker’s appellate arguments and her call for a “deeper analysis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233693 - 2019-01-29
. Despite our full consideration of Stecker’s appellate arguments and her call for a “deeper analysis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233693 - 2019-01-29
[PDF]
State v. Robert T. Langston
filed a no merit report and a supplemental report in reply to Langston’s response.1 Upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11319 - 2017-09-19
filed a no merit report and a supplemental report in reply to Langston’s response.1 Upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11319 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his attorney did not move to suppress his incriminating statements. Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050939 - 2025-12-17
his attorney did not move to suppress his incriminating statements. Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050939 - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858564 - 2024-10-10
RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858564 - 2024-10-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and, therefore, does not know how Milligan wants to proceed. Based on our review of the records, the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215755 - 2018-07-16
and, therefore, does not know how Milligan wants to proceed. Based on our review of the records, the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215755 - 2018-07-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
STAT. RULE 809.32 (2015-16). 1 Lemon did not file a response. Based upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226626 - 2018-11-05
STAT. RULE 809.32 (2015-16). 1 Lemon did not file a response. Based upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226626 - 2018-11-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170542 - 2017-09-21
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170542 - 2017-09-21
Reginald D. Burke v. Gary McCaughtry
ruling without deference to the trial court’s decision, and our review is limited to the committee’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14274 - 2005-03-31
ruling without deference to the trial court’s decision, and our review is limited to the committee’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14274 - 2005-03-31