Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9951 - 9960 of 19291 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 9951 - 9960 of 19291 for transfer by affidavit.
[PDF]
NOTICE
on June 22. That same day, Loper’s counsel filed an affidavit dated June 2 that references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56518 - 2014-09-15
on June 22. That same day, Loper’s counsel filed an affidavit dated June 2 that references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56518 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Kikkert also testified concerning an affidavit she provided to the court on August 15, 2014. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159365 - 2017-09-21
. Kikkert also testified concerning an affidavit she provided to the court on August 15, 2014. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159365 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the same Class C felony of trafficking a child. 7 In support, Conley had offered an “affidavit” from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817058 - 2024-06-25
on the same Class C felony of trafficking a child. 7 In support, Conley had offered an “affidavit” from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817058 - 2024-06-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
. No additional information about the conversation or any affidavit from the juror was submitted. On August 24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29259 - 2014-09-15
. No additional information about the conversation or any affidavit from the juror was submitted. On August 24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29259 - 2014-09-15
WI App 147 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2784 Complete Title...
, 292 U.S. 246, 255 (1934). ¶8 In his affidavit opposing the motion in limine, 118th Street
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104520 - 2013-12-17
, 292 U.S. 246, 255 (1934). ¶8 In his affidavit opposing the motion in limine, 118th Street
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104520 - 2013-12-17
Ohio State Department of Taxation v. Ronald E. Skelton
for the company. In his uncontroverted affidavit, Skelton claimed he was not at the office on the day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14445 - 2005-03-31
for the company. In his uncontroverted affidavit, Skelton claimed he was not at the office on the day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14445 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
discussed below. BACKGROUND ¶2 According to Connolly’s affidavit, Connolly’s primary care physician
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30061 - 2007-08-22
discussed below. BACKGROUND ¶2 According to Connolly’s affidavit, Connolly’s primary care physician
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30061 - 2007-08-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
documents by the parties. Ann filed an affidavit indicating that she had requested Chris’ 2021 tax
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=842786 - 2024-08-28
documents by the parties. Ann filed an affidavit indicating that she had requested Chris’ 2021 tax
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=842786 - 2024-08-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
DeMichele’s reliance on an affidavit of the prior owner of his property which was filed well in advance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83144 - 2014-09-15
DeMichele’s reliance on an affidavit of the prior owner of his property which was filed well in advance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83144 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Andre D. Mitchell
until he read Williams’s affidavit at the postconviction hearing. Williams also testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12705 - 2017-09-21
until he read Williams’s affidavit at the postconviction hearing. Williams also testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12705 - 2017-09-21