Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9961 - 9970 of 51500 for Cost-effective treatments https://simplemedrx.top.

Wausau Steel Corporation v. United Capitol Insurance Company
not sought relief from the consent order in the bankruptcy court, the order remains in effect and bars any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15767 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
. There is no request in this matter for a restitution award, nor is there a request for the imposition of costs against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106205 - 2014-01-02

[PDF] State v. Terri L. Lyons
for the purpose of enforcing court-ordered payments, a practice of questionable cost-effectiveness." Judicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9260 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Roy T. Traynor v. Earl H. Munson, Jr.
$5,619.59 in costs and fees, but disputed an additional $6,873.55 in unpaid costs and fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11154 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI 6
as discussed herein. The parties do not seek to impose the costs of this proceeding upon Attorney Gernetzke
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27842 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in the No. 2013AP583 2 property division. We affirm. We deny Bonnie Kelly’s motion seeking costs and fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112237 - 2017-09-21

Wausau Steel Corporation v. Resource Consultants, Inc.
not sought relief from the consent order in the bankruptcy court, the order remains in effect and bars any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2361 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
to the extent possible, and that we impose the full costs of this proceeding on Attorney Tyree. ¶11 Based
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113337 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
Kelly’s motion seeking costs and fees for a frivolous appeal. ¶2 The parties were married less
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112237 - 2014-05-12

State v. Terri L. Lyons
of enforcing court-ordered payments, a practice of questionable cost-effectiveness." Judicial Council Note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9260 - 2005-03-31