Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9961 - 9970 of 46056 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] State v. George W. Perkins
for four years on various conditions, one of which was to serve nine months in jail with work release
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16057 - 2017-09-21

State v. George W. Perkins
of which was to serve nine months in jail with work release privileges. The offense in this case occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16057 - 2005-03-31

Malachi Watkins v. Michelle Watkins
to address the tests for subject-matter jurisdiction, found in the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2610 - 2005-03-31

Certification
probation agent. Failure to comply with testing would have been grounds to revoke his extended supervision
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58252 - 2010-12-28

[PDF] State v. Edward J. Parker
hospital for blood tests, which showed an alcohol concentration of .318%. The officer issued citations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11493 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 414, 759 N.W.2d 598. No. 2014AP374 6 ¶13 “Wisconsin courts use a three-part test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118993 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Appeal No. 2009AP2907-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2006CF350
. Failure to comply with testing would have been grounds to revoke his extended supervision. On February
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58252 - 2014-09-15

Alden K. Mose v. Tedco Equities -- Potter Road Limited Partnership
in the value of the product because it is inferior in quality and does not work for the general purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12560 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Malachi Watkins v. Michelle Watkins
, because the trial court failed to address the tests for subject-matter jurisdiction, found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2610 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Capitol Indemnity Corporation v. Wild Goose Inn, Inc.
. The supreme court has set forth the test for bad faith in an insurance context: While we have stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7909 - 2017-09-19