Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9961 - 9970 of 63530 for records.
Search results 9961 - 9970 of 63530 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=653150 - 2023-05-04
of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=653150 - 2023-05-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680450 - 2023-07-18
has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680450 - 2023-07-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the record and without making a motion or providing notice to Buoscio. There are at least two problems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147222 - 2017-09-21
the record and without making a motion or providing notice to Buoscio. There are at least two problems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147222 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lyle W. Jourdan
. Nos. 96-0663-CR, 96-0664-CR 96-0665-CR, 96- 0666-CR -3- The facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10490 - 2017-09-20
. Nos. 96-0663-CR, 96-0664-CR 96-0665-CR, 96- 0666-CR -3- The facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10490 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Lyle W. Jourdan
. Nos. 96-0663-CR, 96-0664-CR 96-0665-CR, 96- 0666-CR -3- The facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10492 - 2017-09-20
. Nos. 96-0663-CR, 96-0664-CR 96-0665-CR, 96- 0666-CR -3- The facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10492 - 2017-09-20
State v. Anthony M. Harris
The record does not support Harris’ claim that the trial court conducted an inadequate plea colloquy. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7098 - 2005-03-31
The record does not support Harris’ claim that the trial court conducted an inadequate plea colloquy. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7098 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony M. Harris
The record does not support Harris’ claim that the trial court conducted an inadequate plea colloquy. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7099 - 2005-03-31
The record does not support Harris’ claim that the trial court conducted an inadequate plea colloquy. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7099 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to file a response, and has responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512867 - 2022-04-27
right to file a response, and has responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512867 - 2022-04-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no- merit reports, Sprague’s response, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255475 - 2020-03-04
of the no- merit reports, Sprague’s response, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255475 - 2020-03-04
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95391 - 2014-09-15
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95391 - 2014-09-15

