Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9961 - 9970 of 64206 for records/1000.
Search results 9961 - 9970 of 64206 for records/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The postconviction court also commented on the lack of transcripts in the Record, noting: “Even if the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87403 - 2014-09-15
The postconviction court also commented on the lack of transcripts in the Record, noting: “Even if the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87403 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, 688 N.W.2d 20. It must specify the objectives of the sentence on the record, which include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36017 - 2009-03-31
, 688 N.W.2d 20. It must specify the objectives of the sentence on the record, which include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36017 - 2009-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
” of the crime, Jones’s “troublesome” and rather extensive prior criminal record, and the need to protect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27379 - 2010-10-04
” of the crime, Jones’s “troublesome” and rather extensive prior criminal record, and the need to protect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27379 - 2010-10-04
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
support. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=935915 - 2025-04-02
support. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=935915 - 2025-04-02
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105612 - 2013-12-16
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105612 - 2013-12-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by RULE 809.32 and Anders, I summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752324 - 2024-01-19
the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by RULE 809.32 and Anders, I summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752324 - 2024-01-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2020AP1604-CRNM 2 independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488573 - 2022-03-02
. No. 2020AP1604-CRNM 2 independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488573 - 2022-03-02
[PDF]
Libbie Pesek v. Lincoln County
96-2802 -3- records for review by welfare officials. Because we conclude that the County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9543 - 2017-09-19
96-2802 -3- records for review by welfare officials. Because we conclude that the County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9543 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
support and motion for relief from sanctions. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=657117 - 2023-05-18
support and motion for relief from sanctions. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=657117 - 2023-05-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment and order because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213858 - 2018-06-06
of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment and order because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213858 - 2018-06-06