Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9971 - 9980 of 63536 for records.
Search results 9971 - 9980 of 63536 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Mark Anthony Solorio
supervision. His claim is based on the contentions that the trial court: (1) failed to state on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18775 - 2017-09-21
supervision. His claim is based on the contentions that the trial court: (1) failed to state on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18775 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
considering the no-merit report and independently reviewing the record, we summarily affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177645 - 2017-09-21
considering the no-merit report and independently reviewing the record, we summarily affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177645 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to file a response, and has responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512867 - 2022-04-27
right to file a response, and has responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512867 - 2022-04-27
[PDF]
State v. Adrian E. Stodola
. These activities were recorded by authorities through electronic surveillance, but the tape was lost prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13917 - 2014-09-15
. These activities were recorded by authorities through electronic surveillance, but the tape was lost prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13917 - 2014-09-15
Kathy Schmidt v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
is simply no basis on this record to conclude that [Schmidt] was better qualified than Ms. Blount who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7918 - 2005-03-31
is simply no basis on this record to conclude that [Schmidt] was better qualified than Ms. Blount who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7918 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
reviewing the record, we affirmed the judgment of conviction and postconviction order, concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29858 - 2007-07-30
reviewing the record, we affirmed the judgment of conviction and postconviction order, concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29858 - 2007-07-30
[PDF]
State v. James E. Sterling
., does not specifically state that the records of prior suspensions, revocations or convictions listed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12117 - 2017-09-21
., does not specifically state that the records of prior suspensions, revocations or convictions listed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12117 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Fectory E. Spears
received probation and a third a five-year prison term. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14706 - 2017-09-21
received probation and a third a five-year prison term. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14706 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785771 - 2024-04-09
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785771 - 2024-04-09
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the records, we conclude that the judgments may be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91221 - 2013-01-08
of the report and an independent review of the records, we conclude that the judgments may be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91221 - 2013-01-08