Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9971 - 9980 of 63536 for records.
Search results 9971 - 9980 of 63536 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
and was not made part of the appellate record. See State v. Aderhold, 91 Wis. 2d 306, 314, 284 N.W.2d 108 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63280 - 2011-05-02
and was not made part of the appellate record. See State v. Aderhold, 91 Wis. 2d 306, 314, 284 N.W.2d 108 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63280 - 2011-05-02
CA Blank Order
modification. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103528 - 2013-10-23
modification. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103528 - 2013-10-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127943 - 2017-09-21
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127943 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206161 - 2017-12-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206161 - 2017-12-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, which may be overcome only by objective information in the record justifying the increased sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142822 - 2015-06-09
, which may be overcome only by objective information in the record justifying the increased sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142822 - 2015-06-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
court denied the motion finding that the record belied his assertions, and that he had not established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27785 - 2014-09-15
court denied the motion finding that the record belied his assertions, and that he had not established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27785 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no- merit reports, Sprague’s response, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255475 - 2020-03-04
of the no- merit reports, Sprague’s response, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255475 - 2020-03-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we summarily affirm the orders because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271848 - 2020-07-22
of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we summarily affirm the orders because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271848 - 2020-07-22
[PDF]
State v. Mark Anthony Solorio
supervision. His claim is based on the contentions that the trial court: (1) failed to state on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18775 - 2017-09-21
supervision. His claim is based on the contentions that the trial court: (1) failed to state on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18775 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
considering the no-merit report and independently reviewing the record, we summarily affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177645 - 2017-09-21
considering the no-merit report and independently reviewing the record, we summarily affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177645 - 2017-09-21