Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9991 - 10000 of 20980 for word.

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
. at 687. In other words, in order to prove prejudice, Huck must show that “there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15522 - 2005-03-31

Alan D. Eisenberg v. William E. Deutsch, Jr.
by Kline’s accusations. ¶5 It is well established that an attorney is not allowed to rely on the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20738 - 2005-12-21

[PDF] Kathryn A. Pinter v. Linda Pinter
. Words or phrases in a contract or judgment "are ambiguous when they are reasonably or fairly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9710 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Todd S. Meske
of manipulating the system in order to avoid juvenile court jurisdiction. See id. In other words, if the lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11584 - 2017-09-19

Sagler Masonry & Concrete v. Jeff Netzer
, and no extension was sought. Although the court did not use the words "good cause," it is evident from its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10869 - 2005-03-31

State v. Arthur C. List
’ accelerated penalty regime for drunk-driving offenses used the word “convicted” (the statute uses “committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7072 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
by Stojsavljevic, and her advice to Stojsavljevic on how to try the case. Stojsavljevic wrote that the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36945 - 2009-06-29

[PDF] NOTICE
be assumed to be shared. In other words, I don’t think that I can say that the things that happened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31654 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Arlene Arnold v. David Arnold
to a dictionary definition of “maximize,” which defines the word as “greatest quantity or degree.” He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6578 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Barbara Kloostra v. Travelers Insurance Company
No. 95-0789 -4- constructive notice existed. In other words, Kloostra claims that a jury could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8801 - 2017-09-19