Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1001 - 1010 of 1246 for syke.

State v. Jennifer K. Matejka
of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 DIANE S. SYKES, J. The issue in this case is whether, under
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17470 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Danny R. Peterson v. Midwest Security Insurance Company
of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 DIANE S. SYKES, J. This case requires us to determine who
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17566 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Antwon C. Mathews
. REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Reversed. ¶1 DIANE S. SYKES, J. This case involves
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16480 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. John Allen
June 30, 2004. Justice Diane S. Sykes resigned on July 4, 2004. No. 02-2555-CR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16673 - 2017-09-21

Frontsheet
in my concurrence and not in Justice Sykes' majority opinion) as support for the position that a review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35308 - 2009-01-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
conduct is “egregious.” Schultz v. Sykes, 2001 WI App 255, ¶¶ 9-10, 248 Wis. 2d 746, 638 N.W.2d 604
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189226 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 9
appears in my concurrence and not in Justice Sykes' majority opinion) as support for the position
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35308 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Frontsheet
, 2004 WI 80, ¶109, 273 Wis. 2d 1, 681 N.W.2d 203 (Sykes, J., concurring); see also Town of Rib
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484977 - 2022-02-15

Danny R. Peterson v. Midwest Security Insurance Company
of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 DIANE S. SYKES, J. This case requires us to determine who
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17566 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Microsoft Word - 20211101 FINAL Response Redistricting Criteria Brief.docx
, ¶¶193-98, 236 Wis. 2d 588, 614 N.W.2d 388 (Sykes, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part); see
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/respbriefwislegis.pdf - 2021-11-01