Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10051 - 10060 of 12460 for mr.
Search results 10051 - 10060 of 12460 for mr.
State v. Paul L. Polak
: THE COURT: Mr. Polak, you do not wish the assistance of the public defender’s office? [POLAK]: No, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4172 - 2005-03-31
: THE COURT: Mr. Polak, you do not wish the assistance of the public defender’s office? [POLAK]: No, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4172 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William P. Haessly
statement he challenges was: “No, Mr. Haessly, the only person that went in that house after you was her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6139 - 2017-09-19
statement he challenges was: “No, Mr. Haessly, the only person that went in that house after you was her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6139 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, that “the issue isn’t why the [S]tate dismissed [the battery charge, but] what is in Mr. Velazquez’s mind
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114891 - 2017-09-21
, that “the issue isn’t why the [S]tate dismissed [the battery charge, but] what is in Mr. Velazquez’s mind
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114891 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 160
: Mr. Freeberg: Your Honor, my recommendation— or should I say my hope is [Joseph] will again be back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57082 - 2014-09-15
: Mr. Freeberg: Your Honor, my recommendation— or should I say my hope is [Joseph] will again be back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57082 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Garry C. Eskridge
expectation of privacy in this case is Eskridge’s testimony to this effect: [Defense Counsel]: Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4478 - 2017-09-19
expectation of privacy in this case is Eskridge’s testimony to this effect: [Defense Counsel]: Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4478 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
acknowledged the prosecutor did “point out some negative characteristics of Mr. Schabow,” but she noted he also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144102 - 2015-07-06
acknowledged the prosecutor did “point out some negative characteristics of Mr. Schabow,” but she noted he also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144102 - 2015-07-06
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Neung S.
substance of the County’s rebuttal was as follows: Mr. Froelich … made an argument to you that … [Neung
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2204 - 2017-09-19
substance of the County’s rebuttal was as follows: Mr. Froelich … made an argument to you that … [Neung
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2204 - 2017-09-19
Arthur H. Hurckman v. Secura Insurance Company
... Jensen at a high rate of speed, causing Mr. Jensen to operate his vehicle in a reckless and dangerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9898 - 2005-03-31
... Jensen at a high rate of speed, causing Mr. Jensen to operate his vehicle in a reckless and dangerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9898 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 10, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
together with the manner in which the testimony of Mr. Michael is impeached by the prosecutor that give me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114116 - 2014-06-09
together with the manner in which the testimony of Mr. Michael is impeached by the prosecutor that give me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114116 - 2014-06-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that evidence alone conclude that Mr. Dalton was under the influence. See WIS JI— CRIM[INAL] 2663.” The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171761 - 2017-09-21
that evidence alone conclude that Mr. Dalton was under the influence. See WIS JI— CRIM[INAL] 2663.” The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171761 - 2017-09-21