Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1031 - 1040 of 29957 for de.
Search results 1031 - 1040 of 29957 for de.
Phyllis A. Tannler v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services
are questions of law we review de novo. Local No. 695 v. LIRC, 154 Wis.2d 75, 82, 452 N.W.2d 368, 371 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10237 - 2005-03-31
are questions of law we review de novo. Local No. 695 v. LIRC, 154 Wis.2d 75, 82, 452 N.W.2d 368, 371 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10237 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
employ de novo review. See Kohn v. Darlington Cmty. Schs., 2005 WI 99, ¶11, 283 Wis. 2d 1, 698 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347001 - 2021-03-23
employ de novo review. See Kohn v. Darlington Cmty. Schs., 2005 WI 99, ¶11, 283 Wis. 2d 1, 698 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347001 - 2021-03-23
William O. Chaudoir v. City of Sturgeon Bay
reviewed de novo, and the trial court's ultimate determination that this real estate was not specially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14967 - 2005-03-31
reviewed de novo, and the trial court's ultimate determination that this real estate was not specially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14967 - 2005-03-31
City of Milwaukee v. Shirley A. Negley
claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de novo trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11004 - 2005-03-31
claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de novo trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11004 - 2005-03-31
Mary Jane Lenhardt v. Paul W. Lenhardt
met her burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Finally, we note that a request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15820 - 2005-03-31
met her burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Finally, we note that a request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15820 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Clifford R. Negley
. The Negleys claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11005 - 2017-09-19
. The Negleys claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11005 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Shirley A. Negley
. The Negleys claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11004 - 2017-09-19
. The Negleys claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11004 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 179, 192–193, 717 N.W.2d 1, 7. We review the matter de novo. Id., 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56991 - 2010-11-22
. 2d 179, 192–193, 717 N.W.2d 1, 7. We review the matter de novo. Id., 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56991 - 2010-11-22
[PDF]
Gail Zimbrick v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
-APPELLANT, DE PERE FOUNDRY, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15764 - 2017-09-21
-APPELLANT, DE PERE FOUNDRY, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15764 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. Since these are questions of statutory interpretation, our review is de novo, although we benefit from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255911 - 2020-03-11
. Since these are questions of statutory interpretation, our review is de novo, although we benefit from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255911 - 2020-03-11