Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10321 - 10330 of 64350 for educator arrested 13th bail hearing "2013-2023".
Search results 10321 - 10330 of 64350 for educator arrested 13th bail hearing "2013-2023".
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress evidence of intoxication because, he asserts, the police subjected him to a “de facto” arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110871 - 2017-09-21
to suppress evidence of intoxication because, he asserts, the police subjected him to a “de facto” arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110871 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Starter kit -- 3a: Developing a system map
the following decision points: 1. arrest 2. pretrial status 3. charging/plea 4. sentencing 5. local
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/developingsystemmap.pdf - 2021-09-23
the following decision points: 1. arrest 2. pretrial status 3. charging/plea 4. sentencing 5. local
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/developingsystemmap.pdf - 2021-09-23
State v. Ronald C. Renkoski
, the defendants were arrested, taken into custody, and charged with obstruction. See note 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10584 - 2005-03-31
, the defendants were arrested, taken into custody, and charged with obstruction. See note 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10584 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Bremer
, the defendants were arrested, taken into custody, and charged with obstruction. See note 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10582 - 2005-03-31
, the defendants were arrested, taken into custody, and charged with obstruction. See note 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10582 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ruth Woodring
, the defendants were arrested, taken into custody, and charged with obstruction. See note 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10581 - 2005-03-31
, the defendants were arrested, taken into custody, and charged with obstruction. See note 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10581 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dale A. Coppock
, Detention and Arrest.” 2 This court affirms. ¶2 In the early morning of March 9, 2001, City of West
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4980 - 2017-09-19
, Detention and Arrest.” 2 This court affirms. ¶2 In the early morning of March 9, 2001, City of West
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4980 - 2017-09-19
State v. Karl Meyer
, the defendants were arrested, taken into custody, and charged with obstruction. See note 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10583 - 2005-03-31
, the defendants were arrested, taken into custody, and charged with obstruction. See note 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10583 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, James W. Warren claims that the arresting officer’s opinions based on how he performed during field
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91641 - 2014-09-15
, James W. Warren claims that the arresting officer’s opinions based on how he performed during field
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91641 - 2014-09-15
Columbia County v. Tyler C. Schleicher
arrested him continued questioning him after he asked for counsel, and that statements he made should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3464 - 2005-03-31
arrested him continued questioning him after he asked for counsel, and that statements he made should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3464 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jerry D. Gragg
to arrest him. The trial court disagreed. For the reasons set forth below, this court affirms. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7633 - 2017-09-19
to arrest him. The trial court disagreed. For the reasons set forth below, this court affirms. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7633 - 2017-09-19