Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10321 - 10330 of 17552 for ex.

2007 WI APP 125
apply statutes as they are written. State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court, 2004 WI 58, ¶44, 271 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28539 - 2007-04-26

COURT OF APPEALS
in the first instance, consistent with the general legal meaning of that term”); State ex rel. Murphy v. Voss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35709 - 2009-03-03

State v. Keith L. Allen
that a defendant be sentenced on the basis of true and correct information, State ex rel. LeFebre v. Israel, 109
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10642 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 55.18; see State ex rel. Watts v. Combined Cmty. Servs. Bd., 122 Wis. 2d 65, 84-85, 362 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103934 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Charles E. Carthage
. BACKGROUND ¶2 On October 8, 2001, Carthage violated a domestic abuse restraining order by going to his ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6431 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Barbara Melone v. State
a conclusion based on logic and founded on a proper legal standard. See State ex rel. Cynthia M.S. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2479 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Anthony Keller v. Barbara Keller
Barbara and her ex-husband, Anthony Keller, moved to modify placement. The court granted No. 01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4559 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
....” State ex rel. Macemon v. Christie, 216 Wis. 2d 337, 343, 576 N.W.2d 84 (Ct. App. 1998). The bar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29892 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Scott R. Nasgovitz v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
in violation of WIS. CONST. art I, § 12, which provides that “[n]o bill of attainder, ex post facto law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15216 - 2017-09-21

2008 WI APP 90
theft statute.[4] Id., ¶3. He argued that the statute as applied represented an ex post facto law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32844 - 2011-06-14