Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10331 - 10340 of 24443 for extending.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
years of initial confinement and fifteen years of extended supervision. Hardy first argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330955 - 2021-02-02

[PDF] CA Blank Order
confinement and two years of extended supervision for both counts, consecutive to one another and to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=814801 - 2024-06-24

State v. Johnny Rainey
Rainey to twenty-five years of initial confinement and fifteen years of extended supervision. In 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26293 - 2006-08-29

Certification
endorsement was to modify the policy.[2] The issue we certify is whether the endorsement extended UIM
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30064 - 2007-08-22

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of five years of initial confinement followed by four years of extended supervision. These no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147480 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of extended supervision, consecutive to any other sentence Matthews was serving. This no-merit appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219298 - 2018-09-19

[PDF] State v. Joseph A. Landrum
years of imprisonment, with three years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5655 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
of initial confinement and twenty months of extended supervision. ¶3 At the time the offenses were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6416 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and fifteen years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether there would be any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576041 - 2022-10-13

[PDF] CA Blank Order
concurrent sentences totaling forty years’ initial confinement and twenty years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170199 - 2017-09-21