Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10411 - 10420 of 17547 for ex.

Frontsheet
raises a rebuttable presumption that the addressee received the letter. See State ex rel. Flores v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37743 - 2009-07-14

[PDF] State v. Charles W. Mark
7 Mark relies on several authorities (Minnesota v. Murphy, 465 U.S. 420 (1984); State ex rel. Tate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25744 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with her death. See State ex rel. Milwaukee Cty. Pers. Rev. Bd. v. Clarke, 2006 WI App 186, ¶28, 296 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165053 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
the inquiry.'" State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane Cnty., 2004 WI 58, ¶45, 271 Wis. 2d 633, 681
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131474 - 2017-09-21

State v. Charles W. Mark
consistently held that statutory interpretation "'begins with the language of the statute. . . .'" State ex
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25744 - 2006-06-28

Frontsheet
ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane Cnty., 2004 WI 58, ¶45, 271 Wis. 2d 633, 681 N.W.2d 110
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131474 - 2014-12-09

[PDF] WI APP 12
, administrative agency, or other quasi-judicial tribunal.” State ex rel. City of Waukesha v. City of Waukesha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770178 - 2024-04-10

[PDF] Frontsheet
to another." State ex rel. Friedrich v. Dane Cty. Cir. Ct., 192 Wis. 2d 1, 13, 531 N.W.2d 32 (1995
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242825 - 2019-08-20

[PDF] WI 81
. 13 State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183 Wis. 2d 587, 612-14, 516 N.W.2d 362 (1994
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37743 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Opinion-SC
approval. "With no time for ex ante deliberation, and no metric for ex post assessments, the executive's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260868 - 2020-07-21