Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10491 - 10500 of 30177 for de.

[PDF] State v. Ricky McMorris
of law we review de novo. Whether a prosecutor intended to provoke a mistrial in order to gain another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18274 - 2017-09-21

Jefferson County Child Support Agency v. Bryan J. Addie
. 1987). We review questions of law de novo. Levy v. Levy, 130 Wis. 2d 523, 528, 388 N.W.2d 170 (1986
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5819 - 2005-03-31

State v. Joshua A. Propst
. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg, 174 Wis.2d 191
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14188 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. Baraboo Nat’l Bank v. State, 199 Wis. 2d 153
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33879 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Goodman Forest Industries, Ltd. v. Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
material facts in dispute is a question of law this court decides de novo. Oney v. Schrauth, 197 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11070 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo. Wisconsin Hosp. Ass’n v. Natural Res. Bd., 156 Wis. 2d 688, 700, 457 N.W.2d 879 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223973 - 2018-10-30

2010 WI APP 51
). Interpretation of statutory language is a matter of law we review de novo. Christensen v. Sullivan, 2009 WI 87
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48247 - 2010-04-25

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that we review de novo. See State v. Rohl, 160 Wis. 2d 325, 329, 466 N.W.2d 208 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074454 - 2026-02-10

State v. Robert K.
subject to our de novo review. Id., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d at 669, 607 N.W.2d at 929. Time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7641 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jenelle Glasbrenner
, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). We review conclusions of law de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17883 - 2005-05-02