Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10491 - 10500 of 68499 for did.
Search results 10491 - 10500 of 68499 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
: SYKES, J., did not participate. ATTORNEYS: For the defendant-appellant-petitioner there were
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16657 - 2017-09-21
: SYKES, J., did not participate. ATTORNEYS: For the defendant-appellant-petitioner there were
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16657 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Review-Memo
data and that the viewing by law enforcement did not qualify under the “private search” exception
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997176 - 2025-08-12
data and that the viewing by law enforcement did not qualify under the “private search” exception
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997176 - 2025-08-12
[PDF]
Review-Memo
data and that the viewing by law enforcement did not qualify under the “private search” exception
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997552 - 2025-08-13
data and that the viewing by law enforcement did not qualify under the “private search” exception
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997552 - 2025-08-13
[PDF]
State v. Randall S. Handeland
in an undercover capacity and in an unmarked vehicle. When the officers entered Handeland’s driveway, they did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12994 - 2017-09-21
in an undercover capacity and in an unmarked vehicle. When the officers entered Handeland’s driveway, they did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12994 - 2017-09-21
State v. Scot A. Czarnecki
his conviction. He asserts that the State (1) did not prove that he endorsed the checks in a name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15802 - 2005-03-31
his conviction. He asserts that the State (1) did not prove that he endorsed the checks in a name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15802 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and did not “want any harm put in [her] family’s way.” Though the court assured her that the jurors would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103473 - 2013-10-29
and did not “want any harm put in [her] family’s way.” Though the court assured her that the jurors would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103473 - 2013-10-29
[PDF]
State v. Martin B., Sr.
eighteen. The petition was duly served upon both the mother and Martin. The mother did not contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7982 - 2017-09-19
eighteen. The petition was duly served upon both the mother and Martin. The mother did not contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7982 - 2017-09-19
State v. Kenneth D. Paulson
raised by a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this court. Although Paulson did not petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15776 - 2005-03-31
raised by a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this court. Although Paulson did not petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15776 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert E. Tucker
did not inform him of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966); and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4730 - 2017-09-19
did not inform him of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966); and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4730 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
; he also claimed that he and Shu Dah B. waited four days to seek medical attention because they did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130940 - 2014-12-01
; he also claimed that he and Shu Dah B. waited four days to seek medical attention because they did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130940 - 2014-12-01