Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10491 - 10500 of 12879 for se.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to a Warrantless Search. ¶14 “Warrantless searches are per se unreasonable, subject to several clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253420 - 2020-02-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Kessler and Brennan, JJ., and Thomas Cane, Reserve Judge. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Donald E. Goelz, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133135 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
all that, no. [Appellate Counsel]: Who[se] job would it be, then? [Trial Counsel]: I am not sure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83975 - 2014-09-15

Libbie Pesek v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
. Pesek, pro se,[1] now appeals three orders denying her post-judgment motions: (1) an October 10, 1997
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13457 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Vincent C. Lewis
of an interrogation is “insufficient to justify a per se finding of involuntariness.” State v. Turner, 136 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5598 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
… $5,087,500.” The court noted, “That appraisal does not per se justify a $6.6 million dollar assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93008 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Stacey R. Wilhelm
hearing on December 19, 2001. ¶5 On November 28, 2001, Wilhelm filed a pro se motion with the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6542 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Hoover, P.J., Stark and Hruz, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Nikki Lee, pro se, appeals an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144767 - 2015-07-20

2008 WI App 161
. A. The detective had lawful possession of the cell phone. ¶23 “[W]arrantless searches are per se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34381 - 2008-11-11

State v. Terrence L. Webb
. Terrence L. Webb, pro se, appeals from a judgment of conviction after a jury found him guilty of four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10964 - 2005-03-31