Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10531 - 10540 of 12879 for se.

COURT OF APPEALS
we lacked the supervisory authority necessary to adopt a per se rule against inquiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112783 - 2014-05-27

[PDF] WI App 214
. amend. IV; WIS. CONST. art. I, § 11. ¶15 While, as a general rule, a warrantless search is per se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29968 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 385, 808 N.W.2d 718. ¶19 Warrantless searches are per se unreasonable and are subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93594 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Alexander L. Jacobus v. State
this court; therefore, we do not consider it. 7 Jacobus has proceeded pro se throughout the habeas corpus
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16966 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was permitted to withdraw. ¶9 On February 15, 2015, Mary filed two pro se motions. 4 First, she moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170318 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
trial counsel’s advice to accept the plea offer with the longer sentence was “unreasonable per se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371924 - 2021-06-02

Jeff P. Brinckman v. Maura (Brinckman) Wehrenberg
ability to litigate pro se in an attempt to coerce Wehrenberg to give up representation. Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5546 - 2005-03-31

State v. Juan Smith
suggestive. Single photo identifications are not, per se, impermissibly suggestive. See Kain v. State, 48
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3209 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Curley, P.J., Kessler and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Tyrone Davis Smith, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35788 - 2009-03-09

State v. David J. Roberson
(citations omitted). ¶17 Thus, Harris established the following per se rule: “[W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19422 - 2005-09-19