Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10551 - 10560 of 30154 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutional standard for effective assistance is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757077 - 2024-01-30

Rilla Howard v. Milwaukee Area Vocational
of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12925 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ronald E. Dion
the decision whether to grant a mistrial is usually a discretionary matter, we will consider de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3593 - 2005-03-31

State v. Karen A.O.
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9930 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
, are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33270 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
-Naranjo presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Kletzien, 331 Wis. 2d 640, ΒΆ9
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1091326 - 2026-03-18

[PDF] Robert H. Diamond, Sr. v. Barbara Ruszkiewicz
in denying summary judgment, that denial is also subject to de novo review. See Weina v. Atlantic Mut. Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11011 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that is subject to de novo review.); see also Harris v. Reivitz, 142 Wis. 2d 82, 88, 417
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107362 - 2014-01-27

COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute to undisputed facts presents a question of law for our de novo review. State v. White, 177 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32021 - 2008-03-11

COURT OF APPEALS
. Downey attempted to have that decision reviewed de novo by the circuit court and then by this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112074 - 2014-05-13