Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10621 - 10630 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 10621 - 10630 of 24568 for extending.
CA Blank Order
’ initial confinement and three years’ extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses the potential
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96877 - 2013-05-21
’ initial confinement and three years’ extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses the potential
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96877 - 2013-05-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. The court also imposed a concurrent, two-year sentence for the exposing genitals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=966766 - 2025-06-10
of extended supervision. The court also imposed a concurrent, two-year sentence for the exposing genitals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=966766 - 2025-06-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement and 30 months of extended supervision on each count. This appeal follows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=927708 - 2025-03-18
of initial confinement and 30 months of extended supervision on each count. This appeal follows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=927708 - 2025-03-18
CA Blank Order
years of extended supervision on that charge.[2] Conley did not accept the State’s offer and proceeded
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93192 - 2013-02-18
years of extended supervision on that charge.[2] Conley did not accept the State’s offer and proceeded
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93192 - 2013-02-18
State v. James J. Wardell
not extend to force intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm if the sole reason for the act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10653 - 2005-03-31
not extend to force intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm if the sole reason for the act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10653 - 2005-03-31
Certification
endorsement was to modify the policy.[2] The issue we certify is whether the endorsement extended UIM
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30064 - 2011-05-10
endorsement was to modify the policy.[2] The issue we certify is whether the endorsement extended UIM
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30064 - 2011-05-10
CA Blank Order
was sentenced to twenty years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision on each count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131969 - 2014-12-16
was sentenced to twenty years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision on each count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131969 - 2014-12-16
State v. Derek Ronald Bliss
sentenced him to five years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision for the homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25234 - 2006-05-22
sentenced him to five years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision for the homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25234 - 2006-05-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and six and one- half years of extended supervision. It also ordered six years of probation, 320 days
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225124 - 2018-10-31
and six and one- half years of extended supervision. It also ordered six years of probation, 320 days
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225124 - 2018-10-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
’ extended supervision. This no-merit appeal followed. The no-merit report addresses whether Stull’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93152 - 2014-09-15
’ extended supervision. This no-merit appeal followed. The no-merit report addresses whether Stull’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93152 - 2014-09-15