Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10681 - 10690 of 30172 for de.
Search results 10681 - 10690 of 30172 for de.
[PDF]
Barron County v. Vicki L. Buchner
. 1994). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we value the opinion of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4542 - 2017-09-20
. 1994). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we value the opinion of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4542 - 2017-09-20
Warren D. Patek v. Peggy A. Stearns
; rather, we independently apply the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., to the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12122 - 2005-03-31
; rather, we independently apply the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., to the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12122 - 2005-03-31
Jefferson County Child Support Agency v. Bryan J. Addie
. 1987). We review questions of law de novo. Levy v. Levy, 130 Wis. 2d 523, 528, 388 N.W.2d 170 (1986
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5819 - 2005-03-31
. 1987). We review questions of law de novo. Levy v. Levy, 130 Wis. 2d 523, 528, 388 N.W.2d 170 (1986
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5819 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joshua A. Propst
. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg, 174 Wis.2d 191
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14188 - 2005-03-31
. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg, 174 Wis.2d 191
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14188 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
constitutes a new factor is a question of law, decided by this court de novo. State v. Ralph, 156 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33050 - 2014-09-15
constitutes a new factor is a question of law, decided by this court de novo. State v. Ralph, 156 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33050 - 2014-09-15
Town of Union v. City of Eau Claire
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law we review de novo. See Agnes T. v. Milwaukee County, 189 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6003 - 2005-03-31
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law we review de novo. See Agnes T. v. Milwaukee County, 189 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6003 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas K. Malmquist
: 2 The de minimis nature of the discrepancy in Hoffmann's two testimonies – on the subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11575 - 2017-09-19
: 2 The de minimis nature of the discrepancy in Hoffmann's two testimonies – on the subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11575 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of Delafield, 191 Wis. 2d 586, 595, 530 N.W.2d 16 (Ct. App. 1995). Our de novo review persuades us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97905 - 2013-06-10
of Delafield, 191 Wis. 2d 586, 595, 530 N.W.2d 16 (Ct. App. 1995). Our de novo review persuades us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97905 - 2013-06-10
[PDF]
Dunhill Temps of Milwaukee, Inc. v. Susan A. Covert
, 977–978, 473 N.W.2d 506, 508 (Ct. App. 1991). Our review is de novo. Christian v. Town of Emmett
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11067 - 2017-09-19
, 977–978, 473 N.W.2d 506, 508 (Ct. App. 1991). Our review is de novo. Christian v. Town of Emmett
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11067 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. Baraboo Nat’l Bank v. State, 199 Wis. 2d 153
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33879 - 2014-09-15
interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. Baraboo Nat’l Bank v. State, 199 Wis. 2d 153
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33879 - 2014-09-15