Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11021 - 11030 of 24570 for extending.
Search results 11021 - 11030 of 24570 for extending.
Chapter 32 - Continuing Education for Wisconsin Judiciary
will be of such duration to reasonably allow compliance. For good cause, the judicial education committee may extend
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1091 - 2005-03-31
will be of such duration to reasonably allow compliance. For good cause, the judicial education committee may extend
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1091 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision, consecutive to any other sentence. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859920 - 2024-10-09
of extended supervision, consecutive to any other sentence. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859920 - 2024-10-09
State v. Cornelius Conner
years of initial confinement and four years of extended supervision. Conner argues that his due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18212 - 2005-05-23
years of initial confinement and four years of extended supervision. Conner argues that his due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18212 - 2005-05-23
[PDF]
Jennie E. Stelter v. Green Lantern Restaurant, Inc.
with a motion to extend the deadline. Stelter moved to strike the No. 00-1888 3 answer. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2804 - 2017-09-19
with a motion to extend the deadline. Stelter moved to strike the No. 00-1888 3 answer. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2804 - 2017-09-19
Lee J. Petrina v. James Barnard
with the Barnards provides: [W]e agree to extend Section II — Coverage A, Personal Liability, to cover personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9701 - 2005-03-31
with the Barnards provides: [W]e agree to extend Section II — Coverage A, Personal Liability, to cover personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9701 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, comprising fifteen years’ confinement plus ten years’ extended supervision. This no-merit appeal followed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144292 - 2015-07-14
, comprising fifteen years’ confinement plus ten years’ extended supervision. This no-merit appeal followed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144292 - 2015-07-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of eighteen years of initial confinement and eighteen years of extended supervision. The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241512 - 2019-05-30
of eighteen years of initial confinement and eighteen years of extended supervision. The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241512 - 2019-05-30
COURT OF APPEALS
was extended, via amendment, on seven subsequent occasions. Pope signed these documents as a principal of DexM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91316 - 2013-01-08
was extended, via amendment, on seven subsequent occasions. Pope signed these documents as a principal of DexM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91316 - 2013-01-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Hayslett to fifteen years of initial confinement and seven years of extended supervision. The circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253391 - 2020-01-31
Hayslett to fifteen years of initial confinement and seven years of extended supervision. The circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253391 - 2020-01-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
months of extended supervision. This appeal follows. On appeal, Rose challenges the circuit court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157793 - 2017-09-21
months of extended supervision. This appeal follows. On appeal, Rose challenges the circuit court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157793 - 2017-09-21