Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1111 - 1120 of 96742 for state case.
Search results 1111 - 1120 of 96742 for state case.
State v. Jimmie Davison
), and the court remanded the case to determine the appropriate remedy under State v. Robinson, 2002 WI 9, 249 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16490 - 2005-03-31
), and the court remanded the case to determine the appropriate remedy under State v. Robinson, 2002 WI 9, 249 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16490 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sharon McBride
, the official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. No. 95-1440-CR STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9102 - 2005-03-31
, the official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. No. 95-1440-CR STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9102 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard Dodson
prejudice. See supra n.2. When the State refiled the charges in their present form in this case, it asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10793 - 2005-03-31
prejudice. See supra n.2. When the State refiled the charges in their present form in this case, it asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10793 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roosevelt Williams
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-1821-CR Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17127 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-1821-CR Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17127 - 2005-03-31
State v. William Brueggen
is not an appropriate remedy. In response, Brueggen cites a number of civil cases holding that when the State takes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2206 - 2005-03-31
is not an appropriate remedy. In response, Brueggen cites a number of civil cases holding that when the State takes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2206 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jermaine P.
fail him now[,] because it's [the prosecutor's] burden as representing the State in this case to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9339 - 2005-03-31
fail him now[,] because it's [the prosecutor's] burden as representing the State in this case to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9339 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randy Mcgowan
Complete Title of Case: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21658 - 2006-05-30
Complete Title of Case: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21658 - 2006-05-30
State v. Bruce Rivers
. No. 99-0797-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15301 - 2005-03-31
. No. 99-0797-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15301 - 2005-03-31
State v. Francisco Mata
† Petitions for review filed. Complete Title of Case: No. 95-1336-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9054 - 2005-03-31
† Petitions for review filed. Complete Title of Case: No. 95-1336-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9054 - 2005-03-31
State v. Terry Griffith
of Case: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Terry Griffith, Defendant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17384 - 2005-03-31
of Case: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Terry Griffith, Defendant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17384 - 2005-03-31