Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11131 - 11140 of 58546 for speedy trial.

COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to a new trial on the misdemeanor battery offense in the interest of justice, and argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100732 - 2013-09-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that she is entitled to a new trial on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186985 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Howard A.
rights (TPR); (3) the trial court erred by not conducting a separate TPR trial for each of the children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16001 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Howard A.
rights (TPR); (3) the trial court erred by not conducting a separate TPR trial for each of the children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16004 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
presided over the trial and entered the judgment of conviction. The Honorable Dennis P. Moroney issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100732 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Howard A.
rights (TPR); (3) the trial court erred by not conducting a separate TPR trial for each of the children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16003 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Microsoft Word - 01102289.DOC
and Procedural History...… 1 B. Disposition in the Trial Court…………………... 5 C. Disposition in the Court
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/siebert.pdf - 2011-03-01

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
alleging that his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to impeach witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670760 - 2023-06-22

COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court that denied both his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81586 - 2012-04-30

State v. Dion W. Demmerly
in custody and that the court erroneously allowed the State to introduce the reenactment at trial. Demmerly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11054 - 2005-03-31