Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11171 - 11180 of 13664 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Door Wlingi Blitar.

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
protections against double jeopardy and his interest in the finality of judgments? 10/07/2024 REVW
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920312 - 2025-02-24

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
protections against double jeopardy and his interest in the finality of judgments? 10/07/2024 REVW
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922918 - 2025-02-28

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - February 2009
to the doubling provision in subsection (7)? 3) If the answers to questions 1 and 2 are in the affirmative
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35366 - 2014-09-15

State v. Christopher Swiams
defender (and the attorney representing Swiams on this appeal), said were double-jeopardy concerns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7279 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. . No. 2022AP1618-CR 6 mean[t] double digits on a case where there’s a 40-year maximum.” Trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757473 - 2024-01-30

John P. Trachte v. Andrew E. Barrer
double damages, punitive damages and attorney fees under the Wisconsin Organized Crime Control Act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8301 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the double jeopardy clauses of the United States and Wisconsin Constitutions. State v. Banks, 2010 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115434 - 2014-06-25

[PDF] State v. Kevin S. Meehan
of both counts violates double jeopardy. We disagree. No. 97-3807-CR 16 ¶30 In order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13461 - 2017-09-21

State v. Kevin S. Meehan
conviction of both counts violates double jeopardy. We disagree. ¶30 In order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13461 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jimmy A. Carter
was vacated on double jeopardy principles. The court concluded that it was proper for the judge
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16929 - 2005-03-31