Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11201 - 11210 of 98582 for civil court case status online.
Search results 11201 - 11210 of 98582 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 6, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213774 - 2018-06-06
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 6, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213774 - 2018-06-06
[PDF]
State v. Larry J. Sprosty
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-3524 Complete Title of Case: In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17329 - 2017-09-21
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-3524 Complete Title of Case: In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17329 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91910 - 2013-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91910 - 2013-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
a lesser sentence was warranted given his age, health, and status as a first-time offender. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59313 - 2011-01-24
a lesser sentence was warranted given his age, health, and status as a first-time offender. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59313 - 2011-01-24
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 23, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60260 - 2011-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 23, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60260 - 2011-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case did not favor subrogation, we affirm its decision. By the Court.—Order affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89261 - 2012-11-13
in this case did not favor subrogation, we affirm its decision. By the Court.—Order affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89261 - 2012-11-13
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 20, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89386 - 2012-11-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 20, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89386 - 2012-11-19
COURT OF APPEALS
in the context of this case. We conclude that it did not. ¶8 We acknowledge that the court was imprecise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92889 - 2013-02-13
in the context of this case. We conclude that it did not. ¶8 We acknowledge that the court was imprecise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92889 - 2013-02-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Court case No. 2024CF67, the State charged B.A.G. with one count of terroristic threats, causing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929090 - 2025-03-19
Court case No. 2024CF67, the State charged B.A.G. with one count of terroristic threats, causing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929090 - 2025-03-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Court case No. 2024CF67, the State charged B.A.G. with one count of terroristic threats, causing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929090 - 2025-03-19
Court case No. 2024CF67, the State charged B.A.G. with one count of terroristic threats, causing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929090 - 2025-03-19