Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11241 - 11250 of 69587 for as he.
Search results 11241 - 11250 of 69587 for as he.
COURT OF APPEALS
-degree intentional homicide. Before trial he twice moved to withdraw the plea, but these motions were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32464 - 2008-04-16
-degree intentional homicide. Before trial he twice moved to withdraw the plea, but these motions were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32464 - 2008-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief and motions for reconsideration. He contends that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83976 - 2012-07-11
denying his motion for postconviction relief and motions for reconsideration. He contends that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83976 - 2012-07-11
[PDF]
State v. Frank S. Smith
relief. He contends that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury on his entrapment defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8921 - 2017-09-19
relief. He contends that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury on his entrapment defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8921 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ronald G. Nadolski
no contest plea. On appeal, Nadolski makes four basic arguments: (1) he did not understand the rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15788 - 2017-09-21
no contest plea. On appeal, Nadolski makes four basic arguments: (1) he did not understand the rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15788 - 2017-09-21
State v. Steven D. Cathey
credit of 120 days. He raises no other issues. Because we conclude that Cathey was not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11189 - 2005-03-31
credit of 120 days. He raises no other issues. Because we conclude that Cathey was not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11189 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald G. Nadolski
, Nadolski makes four basic arguments: (1) he did not understand the rights he was waiving by pleading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15788 - 2005-03-31
, Nadolski makes four basic arguments: (1) he did not understand the rights he was waiving by pleading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15788 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
for a period of time he was released to extended supervision but subject to electronic monitoring, first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114776 - 2014-06-12
for a period of time he was released to extended supervision but subject to electronic monitoring, first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114776 - 2014-06-12
[PDF]
Mike Hanna v. Thomas A. Braun
failed to appear at the scheduled hearing. He moved to reopen the case and the proceedings were stayed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14289 - 2014-09-15
failed to appear at the scheduled hearing. He moved to reopen the case and the proceedings were stayed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14289 - 2014-09-15
State v. Choice W. E.
was thirteen years old when he was charged with possession of cocaine with intent to deliver within 1,000 feet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9276 - 2005-03-31
was thirteen years old when he was charged with possession of cocaine with intent to deliver within 1,000 feet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9276 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
address. After he failed to respond, the circuit court entered a default judgment in favor of Midland
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124594 - 2014-10-21
address. After he failed to respond, the circuit court entered a default judgment in favor of Midland
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124594 - 2014-10-21