Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11331 - 11340 of 58381 for speedy trial.

State v. Steven George Lillo
and remand the matter to the trial court with directions that it consider the videotape's admissibility under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14209 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ralph Anton
received ineffective assistance of trial counsel; and (2) he is entitled to a new trial because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10427 - 2005-03-31

William J. Gregg v. Duane H. Pedersen
possession. The Pedersens argue the trial court improperly shifted the burden of proof to them and erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6756 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
The Secretary moved for summary judgment. The trial court denied the motion without prejudice and the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30603 - 2007-10-15

[PDF] Edward M. Moran v. Lakeview Investments
The trial court held one hearing on all three contracts and, after hearing the evidence presented by Moran
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7404 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Lee Andrew Knowlin, Jr.
officers at the scene, the trial court denied the motion. ¶4 At trial Knowlin’s defense consisted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5423 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Commercial Industrial Services of Milwaukee, Inc. v. Frederick H. Grieshaber
- Milwaukee Precision argues that the following findings entered by the trial court are clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9280 - 2017-09-19

State v. Timothy J. Novak
of counsel and due process of law in several other respects. We affirm the judgments and order of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3095 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Andrew D. Wielunski
tax returns to determine that he was an Illinois resident; and (2) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14795 - 2017-09-21

State v. Lynn G.
parental responsibility; and (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in terminating her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6920 - 2005-03-31