Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11371 - 11380 of 83879 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 11371 - 11380 of 83879 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Armando M. Tia
since a search of Tia's residence nine days after the 911 call did not yield a weapon. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8102 - 2017-09-19
since a search of Tia's residence nine days after the 911 call did not yield a weapon. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8102 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Patrick Martin
of marijuana in violation of WIS. STAT. § 961.41(3g)(e). We agree that the search violated the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16029 - 2017-09-21
of marijuana in violation of WIS. STAT. § 961.41(3g)(e). We agree that the search violated the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16029 - 2017-09-21
State v. Armando M. Tia
a search of Tia's residence nine days after the 911 call did not yield a weapon. The trial court withheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8102 - 2005-03-31
a search of Tia's residence nine days after the 911 call did not yield a weapon. The trial court withheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8102 - 2005-03-31
State v. Patrick Martin
). We agree that the search violated the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16029 - 2005-03-31
). We agree that the search violated the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16029 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition 19-06 supporting memo
between the relatively simple administrative reinstatement process available to respondent attorneys
/supreme/docs/1906memo.pdf - 2019-03-14
between the relatively simple administrative reinstatement process available to respondent attorneys
/supreme/docs/1906memo.pdf - 2019-03-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 26, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appe...
the facts in this case. ¶11 As the State explains, and our background section shows, the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138410 - 2015-03-25
the facts in this case. ¶11 As the State explains, and our background section shows, the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138410 - 2015-03-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts in this case. ¶11 As the State explains, and our background section shows, the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138410 - 2017-09-21
the facts in this case. ¶11 As the State explains, and our background section shows, the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138410 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
between Soto and this case, we have considered whether there is arguable merit to a claim that Williams
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112057 - 2014-05-13
between Soto and this case, we have considered whether there is arguable merit to a claim that Williams
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112057 - 2014-05-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
result. Following a hearing the circuit court denied Bray’s motion to suppress.2 The case proceeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236318 - 2019-02-28
result. Following a hearing the circuit court denied Bray’s motion to suppress.2 The case proceeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236318 - 2019-02-28
State v. Scott E. Fuller
that previously this informant had provided reliable information in other drug cases. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20219 - 2005-11-09
that previously this informant had provided reliable information in other drug cases. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20219 - 2005-11-09